@misc{10498/26225,
year = {2021},
month = {12},
url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10498/26225},
abstract = {Management scholarship should be placed in a unique position to develop relevant scientific knowledge because business
and management organizations are deeply involved in most global challenges. However, different critical voices have
recently been raised in essays and editorials, and reports have questioned research in the management field, identifying
multiple deficiencies that can limit the growth of a relatively young field. Based on an analysis of published criticisms
of management research, we would like to shed light on the current state of management research and identify some
limitations that should be considered and should guide the growth of this field of knowledge. This work offers guidance
on the main problems of the discipline that should be addressed to encourage the transformation of management
research to meet both scientific rigor and social relevance. The article ends with a discussion and a call to action for
directing research toward the possibility and necessity of reinforcing “responsible research” in the management field.},
organization = {The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study has benefited from financing from the Research Project ECO2014-56580-R of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitively, and the Research Projects P12-SEJ-1810 and P12-SEJ-1618 from the Andalusia Government (Spain) and PR2016-018 (Research Projects University of Cadiz).},
publisher = {SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC},
keywords = {Management field},
keywords = {management research},
keywords = {Valley of Death},
keywords = {academic reward system},
keywords = {socially responsible science},
title = {Self-criticisms toward a socially responsible science in the field of management},
doi = {10.1177/23409444211062230},
author = {Frutos Belizón, Jesús de and Martín Alcázar, Fernando and Sánchez Gardey, Gonzalo},
}