%0 Journal Article 
%A Manolache, Veronica
%A Motas, Natalia
%A Bosinceanu, Mugurel Liviu
%A de la Torre, Mercedes
%A Gallego Poveda, Javier
%A Dunning, Joel
%A Ismail, Mahmoud
%A Turna, Akif
%A Paradela, Marina
%A Decker, Georges
%A Ramos, Ricard
%A Bodner, Johanes
%A Espinosa Jiménez, Dionisio
%A Zardo, Patrick
%A Garcia Perez, Alejandro
%A Ureña Lluveras, Anna
%A Pantile, Daniel
%A Gonzalez-Rivas, Diego
%T Comparison of uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery pulmonary anatomic resections with multiport robotic-assisted thoracic surgery: a multicenter study of the European experience
%D 2023
%@ 2225-319X
%U http://hdl.handle.net/10498/29796
%X Background: Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has seen increasing interest in the last few years, with most procedures primarily being performed in the conventional multiport manner. Our team has developed a new approach that has the potential to convert surgeons from uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) or open surgery to robotic-assisted surgery, uniportal-RATS (U-RATS). We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of one single incision, uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (U-RATS) against standard multiport RATS (M-RATS) with regards to safety, feasibility, surgical technique, immediate oncological result, postoperative recovery, and 30-day follow-up morbidity and mortality. Methods: We performed a large retrospective multi-institutional review of our prospectively curated database, including 101 consecutive U-RATS procedures performed from September 2021 to October 2022, in the European centers that our main surgeon operates in. We compared these cases to 101 consecutive M-RATS cases done by our colleagues in Barcelona between 2019 to 2022. Results: Both patient groups were similar with respect to demographics, smoking status and tumor size, but were significantly younger in the U-RATS group [M-RATS =69 (range, 39–81) years; U-RATS =63 years (range, 19–82) years; P<0.0001]. Most patients in both operative groups underwent resection of a primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [M-RATS 96/101 (95%); U-RATS =60/101 (59%); P<0.0001]. The main type of anatomic resection was lobectomy for the multiport group, and segmentectomy for the U-RATS group. In the M-RATS group, only one anatomical segmentectomy was performed, while the U-RATS group had twenty-four (24%) segmentectomies (P=0.0006). All M-RATS and U-RATS surgical specimens had negative resection margins (R0) and contained an equivalent median number of lymph nodes available for pathologic analysis [M-RATS =11 (range, 5–54); U-RATS =15 (range, 0–41); P=0.87]. Conversion rate to thoracotomy was zero in the U-RATS group and low in M-RATS [M-RATS =2/101 (2%); U-RATS =0/101; P=0.19]. Median operative time was also statistically different [M-RATS =150 (range, 60–300) minutes; U-RATS =136 (range, 30–308) minutes; P=0.0001]. Median length of stay was significantly lower in U-RATS group at four days [M-RATS =5 (range, 2–31) days; U-RATS =4 (range, 1–18) days; P[removed]
%K lung cancer
%K multiport robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (M-RATS)
%K robotic lung resections
%K Uniportal robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (U-RATS)
%~ Universidad de Cádiz