Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLiu, X. H.
dc.contributor.authorKhansari, A. R.
dc.contributor.authorTeles, M.
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Rodríguez, Gonzalo
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Y. G.
dc.contributor.authorMancera Romero, Juan Miguel 
dc.contributor.authorReyes-Lopez, F. E.
dc.contributor.authorTort, L.
dc.contributor.otherBiologíaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-12T07:20:17Z
dc.date.available2019-07-12T07:20:17Z
dc.date.issued2019-06
dc.identifier.issn1664-042X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/21565
dc.description.abstractVaccination is a widely used therapeutical strategy in aquaculture, but whether vaccination elicits stress responses in the central neuroendocrine system and enhances the crosstalk between the immune and endocrine systems in the brain or pituitary after vaccination is unclear. To answer this question two experiments using two different vaccine exposure routes, i.e., bath or intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection, were carried out on gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.). In the first one, the stress responses of fish subjected to waterborne Vibrio anguillarum bacterin were compared with responses after air exposure or their combination. In the second experiment, fish were subjected to an intraperitoneal injection of Lactococcus garvieae bacterin and we assessed the central stress response and also whether or not a significant immune response was induced in brain and pituitary. In both experiments, blood, brain and pituitary tissues were collected at 1, 6, and 24 h post stress for plasma hormone determination and gene expression analysis, respectively. Results indicated that bath vaccination induced a decreased central stress response compared to air exposure which stimulated both brain and pituitary stress genes. In the second experiment, injection vaccination kept unchanged plasma stress hormones except cortisol that raised at 6 and 24 h. In agreement, non-significant or slight changes on the transcription of stress-related genes were recorded, including the hormone genes of the hypothalamic pituitary interrenal (HPI) axis and other stress markers such as hsp70, hsp90, and mt genes in either brain or pituitary. Significant changes were observed, however, in crhbp and gr. In this second experiment the immune genes il1b, cox2, and lys, showed a strong expression in both brain and pituitary after vaccination, notably il1b which showed more than 10 fold raise. Overall, vaccination procedures, although showing a cortisol response, did not induce other major stress response in brain or pituitary, regardless the administration route. Other than main changes, the alteration of crhbp and gr suggests that these genes could play a relevant role in the feedback regulation of HPI axis after vaccination. In addition, from the results obtained in this work, it is also demonstrated that the immune system maintains a high activity in both brain and pituitary after vaccine injection.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFRONTIERS MEDIA SAen_US
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceFrontiers in Physiology - 2019 10:717en_US
dc.subjectbrainen_US
dc.subjectpituitaryen_US
dc.subjectvaccinationen_US
dc.subjectimmune responseen_US
dc.subjectstress responseen_US
dc.titleBrain and Pituitary Response to Vaccination in Gilthead Seabream (Sparus aurata L.)en_US
dc.typejournal articleen_US
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fphys.2019.00717


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
This work is under a Creative Commons License Atribución 4.0 Internacional