Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGonzález García, Inmaculada 
dc.contributor.otherDerecho Internacional Público, Penal y Procesales_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-17T12:57:38Z
dc.date.available2020-01-17T12:57:38Z
dc.date.issued2019-12
dc.identifier.issn2341-0868
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/22104
dc.description.abstractFollowing a brief overview of immigration in Spain, the present paper first analyses the main routes of irregular immigration into Spain, giving recent data on the number of arrivals by sea and land to the Iberian Peninsula, Balearic Islands, Canary Islands and Spanish territories in North Africa. The sea has traditionally been the main route of entry to Spanish territory for immigrants primarily from Sub-Saharan Africa. However, the years 2013 to 2015 proved an exception to this rule, with immigration by land outstripping that by sea due to an increase in the arrival of Syrian immigrants to the cities of Ceuta and above all Melilla. Next, a description is given of the political and operational mechanisms established by the Spanish authorities to control Spain’s maritime borders, especially in the Canary Islands. Such border control is achieved through unilateral surveillance measures (the Integrated External Surveillance System, Spanish initials: SIVE), bilateral cooperation (inter-state agreements with Morocco and other countries in Sub-Saharan Africa) and regional cooperation within the European Union (EU). This is followed by a discussion of how immigration routes have been affected by increased cooperation between Spain and African States to intercept immigrants in their countries of origin or during transit. There is likewise an analysis of Spain’s use of summary returns or pushbacks following assaults or jumps on the border fences surrounding Ceuta and Melilla and attempts of arrival by swimming in Ceuta or by sea to Spanish islands and islets in North Africa, within the framework of the 1992 Spanish-Moroccan agreement on readmission of foreigners who have entered irregularly. Lastly, we argue that the reinforcement of border control alone is insufficient to curb migration flows: to be effective, it must be accompanied by common policies in the European countries of destination and increased investment in the countries of origin to provide their citizens with the opportunity to obtain a higher standard of living and overcome the temptation to emigrate as a first option.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherEditorial UCAes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourcePaix et Securité Internationales - Journal of International Law and International Relationses_ES
dc.subjectImmigrationes_ES
dc.subjectSpaines_ES
dc.subjectWest African routees_ES
dc.subjectWestern Mediterranean routees_ES
dc.subjectCeutaes_ES
dc.subjectborder controles_ES
dc.subjectMelillaes_ES
dc.subjectborderes_ES
dc.subjectSpanish-Moroccan agreement on readmissiones_ES
dc.subjectMoroccoes_ES
dc.subjectHuman Rightses_ES
dc.titleImmigration in Spain: Migratory Routes, Cooperation with Third Countries and Human Rights in Return Procedureses_ES
dc.title.alternativeL'immigration en Espagne : Routes migratoires, coopération avec les pays tiers et droits de l'homme dans les procédures de retoures_ES
dc.title.alternativeInmigración en España: Rutas migratorias, cooperación con terceros países y derechos humanos en los procedimientos de retornoes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.25267/Paix_secur_int.2019.i7.06


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
This work is under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional