Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCerezo Narváez, Alberto 
dc.contributor.authorPastor Fernández, Andrés 
dc.contributor.authorOtero Mateo, Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorBallesteros Pérez, Pablo 
dc.contributor.otherIngeniería Mecánica y Diseño Industriales_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-06T13:05:35Z
dc.date.available2020-05-06T13:05:35Z
dc.date.issued2020-02
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/22876
dc.description.abstractScope management allows project managers to react when a project underperforms regarding schedule, budget, and/or quality at the execution stage. Scope management can also minimize project changes and budget omissions, as well as improve the accuracy of project cost estimates and risk responses. For scope management to be effective, though, it needs to rely on a robust work breakdown structure (WBS). A robust WBS hierarchically and faithfully reflects all project tasks and work packages so that projects are easier to manage. If done properly, the WBS also allows meeting the project objectives while delivering the project on time, on budget, and with the required quality. This paper analyzes whether the integration of a cost breakdown structure (CBS) can lead to the generation of more robust WBSs in construction projects. Over the last years, some international organizations have standardized and harmonized different cost classification systems (e.g., ISO 12006-2, ISO 81346-12, OmniClass, CoClass, UniClass). These cost databases have also been introduced into building information modeling (BIM) frameworks. We hypothesize that in BIM environments, if these CBSs are used to generate the project WBS, several advantages are gained such as sharper project definition. This enhanced project definition reduces project contradictions at both planning and execution stages, anticipates potential schedule and budget deviations, improves resource allocation, and overall it allows a better response to potential project risks. The hypothesis that the use of CBSs can generate more robust WBSs is tested by the response analysis of a questionnaire survey distributed among construction practitioners and project managers. By means of structural equation modeling (SEM), the correlation (agreement) and perception differences between two 250-respondent subsamples (technical project staff vs. project management staff) are also discussed. Results of this research support the use of CBSs by construction professionals as a basis to generate WBSs for enhanced project management (PM).es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceAppl. Sci. 2020, 10(4), 1386es_ES
dc.subjectscope managementes_ES
dc.subjectwork breakdown structure (WBS)es_ES
dc.subjectcost breakdown structure (CBS)es_ES
dc.subjectconstruction industryes_ES
dc.subjectcost classification systemes_ES
dc.subjectbuilding information modeling (BIM)es_ES
dc.titleIntegration of Cost andWork Breakdown Structures in the Management of Construction Projectses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app10041386


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
This work is under a Creative Commons License Atribución 4.0 Internacional