Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArias Téllez, María José
dc.contributor.authorCarrasco, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorEspaña Romero, Vanesa 
dc.contributor.authorInostroza, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorBustamante, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorSolar Altamirano, Ignacio
dc.contributor.otherDidáctica de la Educación Física, Plástica y Musicales_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-11T11:36:09Z
dc.date.available2020-06-11T11:36:09Z
dc.date.issued2019-11
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/23176
dc.description.abstractObjective To compare body composition estimations of field estimation methods: Durnin & Womersley anthropometry (DW-ANT), bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and Deborah-Kerr anthropometry (DK-ANT) against dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a male Chilean sport climbing sample. Methods 30 adult male climbers of different performance levels participated in the study. A DXA scan (Lunar Prodigy (R)) was used to determine fat mass, lean mass and total bone mineral content (BMC). Total muscle mass (MM, kg) was estimated through a validated prediction model. DW-ANT and BIA ("non-athletes" and "athletes" equations) were used to determinate fat mass percentage (FM %), while DK-ANT was utilized to estimate MM and BMC. Results A significant (p<0.01) inter-method difference was observed for all methods analyzed. When compared to DXA, DW-ANT and BIA underestimated FM% and DK-ANT overestimated MM and BMC (All p< 0.01). The inter-method differences was lower for DW-ANT. Discussion We found that body composition estimation in climbers is highly method dependent. If DXA is not available, DW-ANT for FM% has a lower bias of estimation than BIA in young male Chilean climbers. For MM and BMC, further studies are needed to compare and estimate the DK-ANT bias level. For both methods, correction equations for specific climbing population should be considered.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCEes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourcePLoS ONE 14(11): e0224291es_ES
dc.titleA comparison of body composition assessment methods in climbers: Which is better?es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0224291


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
This work is under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional