• español
    • English
  • Login
  • English 
    • español
    • English

UniversidaddeCádiz

Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones
Communities and Collections
View Item 
  •   RODIN Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • View Item
  •   RODIN Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Effects of a Rehabilitation Programme with a Nasal Inspiratory Restriction Device on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life in COPD

Thumbnail
Identificadores

URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/23459

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17103669

ISSN: 1660-4601

Files
2020_331.pdf (1.656Mb)
Statistics
View statistics
Metrics and citations
 
Share
Export
Export reference to MendeleyRefworksEndNoteBibTexRIS
Metadata
Show full item record
Author/s
Arnedillo Muñoz, AurelioAuthority UCA; González Montesinos, José LuisAuthority UCA; Fernández Santos, Jorge del RosarioAuthority UCA; Vaz Pardal, Carmen; España-Domínguez, Carolina; Ponce González, Jesús GustavoAuthority UCA; Cuenca García, María MagdalenaAuthority UCA
Date
2020-05
Department
Didáctica de la Educación Física, Plástica y Musical
Source
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(10), 3669
Abstract
Objective: The objective was to assess the effects of a nasal restriction device for inspiratory muscle training, called Feelbreathe((R)), added to a rehabilitation program (RP) on exercise capacity, quality of life, dyspnea and inspiratory muscle strength in patients with stable COPD. Methods: Patients were randomized into three groups, one performed a supervised RP using the Feelbreathe((R)) device (FB group), the second group developed the same RP with oronasal breathing without FB (ONB group) and the third was the control group (CG). We evaluated inspiratory muscle strength (PImax), dyspnea (mMRC), quality of life (CAT) and exercise capacity (6MWT) before and after 8-week of RP. Results: A total of 16 patients completed the study, seven in FB group, five in ONB group and four in the CG. After the RP, the FB group showed a significant increase in PImax (93.3 +/- 19.1 vs. 123.0 +/- 15.8 mmHg) and in the 6MWT distance (462.9 +/- 71.8 m vs. 529.1 +/- 50.1 m) and a decrease in the CAT score (9.7 +/- 6.5 vs. 5.9 +/- 6.0) and in the mMRC dyspnea score. FB provides greater improvement in PImax, dyspnea, quality of life and 6MWT than ONB. Conclusions: The Feelbreathe((R)) device provides greater improvements in quality of life, dyspnea, exercise capacity and inspiratory muscle strength compared to patients that did not use it.
Subjects
COPD; pulmonary rehabilitation; medical device; inspiratory muscle training
Collections
  • Artículos Científicos [11968]
  • Articulos Científicos Did. E. Fis. [461]
  • Artículos Científicos INIBICA [1093]
Atribución 4.0 Internacional
This work is under a Creative Commons License Atribución 4.0 Internacional

Browse

All of RODINCommunities and CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Información adicional

AboutDeposit in RODINPoliciesGuidelinesRightsLinksStatisticsNewsFrequently Asked Questions

RODIN is available through

OpenAIREOAIsterRecolectaHispanaEuropeanaBaseDARTOATDGoogle Academic

Related links

Sherpa/RomeoDulcineaROAROpenDOARCreative CommonsORCID

RODIN está gestionado por el Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz

Contact informationSuggestionsUser Support