Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLópez Bueno, Rubén
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Lars Louis
dc.contributor.authorKoyanagi, Ai
dc.contributor.authorNúñez Cortés, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorCalatayud, Joaquín
dc.contributor.authorCasaña, José
dc.contributor.authorPozo Cruz, Borja del 
dc.contributor.otherDidáctica de la Educación Física, Plástica y Musicales_ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-11T07:17:10Z
dc.date.available2023-10-11T07:17:10Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-01
dc.identifier.issn1568-1637
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/29414
dc.description.abstractBackground: While handgrip strength is associated with all-cause and cause-specific mortality, whether such associations are dose-dependent is largely unknown. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review on the dose-response relationship of handgrip strength with all-cause mortality, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality. Methods: The data source included three electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus) from inception to 8 February 2022. Prospective cohort studies of healthy adults with objective measures of handgrip strength were included. Two researchers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We used estimates regarding handgrip strength categories to conduct a random forest model, and a two-stage random-effects hierarchical meta-regression model pooling study-specific estimates for dose-response relationship. Outcomes included all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality. Reults: Forty-eight studies comprising 3,135,473 participants (49.6% women, age range 35–85 years) were included. Random forest models showed a significant inverse association between handgrip strength and all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Dose-response meta-analyses showed that higher levels of handgrip strength significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality within 26–50 kg (Higgin´s I2 =45.7%) in a close-to-linear inverse fashion. Cancer and cardiovascular mortality displayed a trend towards a U-shaped association with a significant risk reduction between 16 and 33 kg (Higgin´s I2 =77.4%), and a close-to-linear inverse shaped and significant risk reduction ranging from 24 to 40 kg (Higgin´s I2 =79.7%) respectively. Conclusion: There is strong evidence for an association between lower handgrip strength with higher all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality risk. The dose-response relationship of handgrip strength substantially varies depending on the cause of mortalityes_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceAgeing Research Reviews. Vol. 82, December 2022, 101778es_ES
dc.subjectLongevityes_ES
dc.subjectMuscle strength dynamometeres_ES
dc.subjectPublic healthes_ES
dc.subjectRisk factorses_ES
dc.titleThresholds of handgrip strength for all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality: A systematic review with dose-response meta-analysises_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.description.physDesc12 páginases_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.arr.2022.101778
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Junta de Andalucía//EMERGIA 2020%2F00158es_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
This work is under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional