Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorSantos, Jorge 
dc.contributor.authorCifrian, Eva
dc.contributor.authorYoris Nobile, Adrian I.
dc.contributor.authorBlanco Fernández, Elena
dc.contributor.authorCastro Fresno, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorAndres, Ana
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Romero, Araceli 
dc.contributor.otherQuímica Analíticaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-13T09:20:18Z
dc.date.available2023-10-13T09:20:18Z
dc.date.issued2022-10-08
dc.identifier.issn0045-6535
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/29423
dc.description.abstractEcotoxicological analysis of construction products is a relatively unexplored area at international level. Aquatic toxicity tests on construction products has been recommended recently for freshwater environment. However, the biological effects of alternative materials on marine ecosystem are still not considered. In this study, the main aim was to assess the environmental impact of alternative mortars proposed as artificial reefs (ARs) materials. The ARs specimens were developed by 3D printing, based on cement and geopolymer mortars using recycled sands of glass and seashells. For this purpose, a leaching test and two different toxicity bioassays, luminosity reduction of marine bacteria Vibrio fischeri (Microtox®) and the success of embryo-larval development of sea-urchin Paracentrotus lividus, were conducted. From the leaching results it should be noted that the mobility of all trace elements considered in both, raw materials and mortars, meet the inert landfill limits, except As, Mo, Se or Sb in the leachates geopolymer mortars. However, the results obtained from the both bioassays show low environmental acceptability for those mortars containing shell sand, probably due to the degradation of the organic matter adhered to the shells. On the other hand, cement mortars obtain better results than geopolymer mortars, regardless of the aggregate used, showing certain consistency with the leaching behaviour, since they present the lowest mobility of trace chemical elements. Therefore, the results supporting the environmental acceptability of its potential use as alternative materials in the production of ARs.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceChemosphere. Vol. 310, January 2023, 136773es_ES
dc.subjectBioassayses_ES
dc.subjectCementes_ES
dc.subjectGeopolymeres_ES
dc.subjectLeachinges_ES
dc.subjectMortarses_ES
dc.titleAssessment of the environmental acceptability of potential artificial reef materials using two ecotoxicity tests: Luminescent bacteria and sea urchin embryogenesises_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.description.physDesc10 páginases_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136773
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/RTI2018-097612-B-C22/ES/NUEVOS RETOS EN CEMENTOS DE ACTIVACION ALCALINA: SOSTENIBILIDAD Y EVALUACION AMBIENTAL/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI//IJC 2018–037545-Ies_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional