Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoreno Andrés, Javier 
dc.contributor.authorRueda-Márquez, Juan José
dc.contributor.authorHomola, Tomas
dc.contributor.authorVielma, Jouni
dc.contributor.authorMoriñigo, Miguel Ángel
dc.contributor.authorMikola, Anna
dc.contributor.authorSillanpaa, Mika
dc.contributor.authorAcevedo Merino, Asunción 
dc.contributor.authorNebot Sanz, Enrique 
dc.contributor.authorLevchuk, Irina
dc.contributor.otherTecnologías del Medio Ambientees_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-11T08:18:48Z
dc.date.available2024-01-11T08:18:48Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-15
dc.identifier.issn0043-1354
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/29937
dc.description.abstractThe development of technologically advanced recirculation aquaculture systems (RAS) implies the reuse of water in a high recirculation rate (>90%). One of the most important phases for water management in RAS involves water disinfection in order to avoid proliferation of potential pathogens and related fish diseases. Accordingly, different approaches have been assessed in this study by performing a comparison of photolytic (UV-LEDs) at different wavelengths (λ = 262, 268 and 262 + 268 nm), photochemical (UV-LEDs/H2O2, UV-LEDs/HSO5− and UV-LEDs/S2O82−) and photocatalytic (TiO2/SiO2/UV-LEDs and ZnO/SiO2/UV-LEDs) processes for the disinfection of water in RAS streams. Different laboratory tests were performed in batch scale with real RAS stream water and naturally occurring bacteria (Aeromonas hydrophyla and Citrobacter gillenii) as target microorganisms. Regarding photolytic processes, higher inactivation rates were obtained by combining λ262+268 in front of single wavelengths. Photochemical processes showed higher efficiencies by comparison with a single UV-C process, especially at 10 mg L−1 of initial oxidant dose. The inactivation kinetic rate constant was improved in the range of 15–38%, with major efficiency for UV/H2O2 ∼ UV/HSO5− > UV/S2O82−. According to photocatalytic tests, higher efficiencies were obtained by improving the inactivation kinetic rate constant up to 55% in comparison with a single UV-C process. Preliminary cost estimation was conducted for all tested disinfection methods. Those results suggest the potential application of UV-LEDs as promoter of different photochemical and photocatalytic processes, which are able to enhance disinfection in particular cases, such as the aquaculture industry.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceWater Research Volume 181, 15 August 2020, 115928es_ES
dc.subjectAdvanced oxidation processeses_ES
dc.subjectUVC-LEDses_ES
dc.subjectRecirculation aquaculture systems (RAS)es_ES
dc.subjectNatural occurring bacteriaes_ES
dc.subjectUV inactivationes_ES
dc.subjectPersulfatees_ES
dc.titleA comparison of photolytic, photochemical and photocatalytic processes for disinfection of recirculation aquaculture systems (RAS) streamses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/J.WATRES.2020.115928
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/Junta de Andalucía//FEDER-UCA18-108023es_ES
dc.type.hasVersionAMes_ES


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
This work is under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional