Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCastro Yuste, Cristina María 
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Cabanillas, María José 
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Cornejo, María Jesús 
dc.contributor.authorCarnicer Fuentes, Concepción 
dc.contributor.authorPaloma Castro, Olga 
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Corral, Luis Javier 
dc.contributor.otherEnfermería y Fisioterapiaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-23T11:34:07Z
dc.date.available2024-01-23T11:34:07Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1532-2793
dc.identifier.issn0260-6917
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/30207
dc.description.abstractBackground: The evaluation of the level of clinical competence acquired by the student is a complex process that must meet various requirements to ensure its quality. The psychometric analysis of the data collected by the assessment tools used is a fundamental aspect to guarantee the student's competence level. Aim: To conduct a psychometric analysis of an instrument which assesses clinical competence in nursing students at simulation stations with standardized patients in OSCE-format tests. Method: The construct of clinical competence was operationalized as a set of observable and measurable behaviors, measured by the newly-created Student Assessment Tool for Standardized Patient Simulations (SATSPS), which was comprised of 27 items. The categories assigned to the items were ‘incorrect or not performed’ (0), ‘acceptable’ (1), and ‘correct’ (2). Participants: 499 nursing students. Data were collected by two independent observers during the assessment of the students' performance at a four-station OSCE with standardized patients. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the variables. The difficulty levels and floor and ceiling effects were determined for each item. Reliability was analyzed using internal consistency and inter-observer reliability. The validity analysis was performed considering face validity, content and construct validity (through exploratory factor analysis), and criterion validity. Results: Internal reliability and inter-observer reliability were higher than 0.80. The construct validity analysis suggested a three-factor model accounting for 37.1% of the variance. These three factors were named ‘Nursing process’, ‘Communication skills’, and ‘Safe practice’. A significant correlation was found between the scores obtained and the students' grades in general, as well as with the grades obtained in subjects with clinical content. Conclusions: The assessment tool has proven to be sufficiently reliable and valid for the assessment of the clinical competence of nursing students using standardized patients. This tool has three main components: the nursing process, communication skills, and safety management.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceNurse Education Today, Vol. 64, 2018, pp. 79-84es_ES
dc.subjectStudent assessment tooles_ES
dc.subjectClinical competencees_ES
dc.subjectNursing educationes_ES
dc.subjectPsychometric analysises_ES
dc.subjectStandardized patientes_ES
dc.subjectAssessing clinical competencees_ES
dc.titleA Student Assessment Tool for Standardized Patient Simulations (SAT-SPS): Psychometric analysises_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.005
dc.type.hasVersionAMes_ES


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
This work is under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional