Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMartinez-Tellez, Borja
dc.contributor.authorPerez Bey, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Delgado, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorAcosta, Francisco M.
dc.contributor.authorCorral Pérez, Juan 
dc.contributor.authorAlcantara, Juan M.A.
dc.contributor.authorLlamas-Elvira, Jose M. 
dc.contributor.authorRuiz, Jonatan R.
dc.contributor.otherDidáctica de la Educación Física, Plástica y Musicales_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-14T10:21:50Z
dc.date.available2024-06-14T10:21:50Z
dc.date.issued2019-05
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/32573
dc.description.abstractBrown adipose tissue (BAT) thermogenic activity is commonly assessed with a positron emission tomography with computed tomography scan (PET/CT). This technique has several limitations and alternative techniques are needed. Supraclavicular skin temperature measured with iButtons and infrared thermography (IRT) has been proposed as an indirect marker of BAT activity. We studied the concurrent validity of skin temperature measured with iButtons vs. IRT and the association of supraclavicular skin temperature measured with iButtons and IRT with BAT. We measured skin temperature upon a shivering threshold test with iButtons and IRT in 6 different regions in 12 participants (n = 2 men). On a separate day, we determined supraclavicular skin temperature with an iButton and IRT after 2 h of a personalized cooling protocol. Thereafter, we quantified BAT volume and activity by PET/CT. We observed that the absolute differences between the devices were statistically different from 0 (all P < 0.05) after the shivering threshold test. Moreover, we did not find any association between supraclavicular skin temperature measured with iButtons or IRT and BAT 18F-FDG activity (r = −0.213; P = 0.530 and r = −0.079; P = 0.817). However, we observed a negative association of supraclavicular skin temperature measured by IRT with BAT 18F-FDG volume (r = −0.764; P = 0.006), but not with supraclavicular skin temperature measured with iButtons (r = −0.546; P = 0.082). In light of these results, we concluded that the measurement of skin temperature obtained by iButtons and IRT are not comparable. Furthermore, it seems that supraclavicular skin temperature is not associated with BAT 18F-FDG activity, but it appears to be negatively associated with BAT 18F-FDG volume in the case of IRT.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectbrown fates_ES
dc.subjectskin temperaturees_ES
dc.subjectthermoregulationes_ES
dc.titleConcurrent validity of supraclavicular skin temperature measured with iButtons and infrared thermography as a surrogate marker of brown adipose tissuees_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.04.009
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//RYC-2014-16938/ES/RYC-2014-16938/ es_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
This work is under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional