• español
    • English
  • Login
  • English 
    • español
    • English

UniversidaddeCádiz

Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones
Communities and Collections
View Item 
  •   RODIN Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • View Item
  •   RODIN Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Progress on coastal management in Ecuador (2007-2017)

Identificadores

URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/33415

DOI: 10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2018.09.016

ISSN: 1873-6416

Files
Acceso cerrado (3.225Mb)
Statistics
View statistics
Metrics and citations
 
Share
Export
Export reference to MendeleyRefworksEndNoteBibTexRIS
Metadata
Show full item record
Author/s
Pazmiño Manrique, Pablo; Barragán Muñoz, Juan ManuelAuthority UCA; García Sanabria, JavierAuthority UCA
Date
2018
Department
Historia, Geografía y Filosofía
Source
Environmental Science & Policy Volume 90 , December 2018, Pages 135-147
Abstract
The disaster caused by shrimp acuaculture in the mangrove forests of Ecuador was the driving force for internationally approved state action. For more than two decades Ecuador had been implementing a program of management of coastal resources (1986–2008). Furthermore, political changes in Ecuador between 2007 and 2017 also affected coastal management. These changes have been observed by analysing five key aspects related to ICZM: politics, strategies, regulation, institutions and instruments. The results obtained indicate that the management of marine areas and resources were not well situated within the political agenda. Additionally the model employed for coastal management over the past decade was not the result of a specific policy of ICZM. On the contrary, the coast was governed by more general unconnected policies, namely environmental, spatial planning and social and economic policies. Additionally Ecuador does not currently have the primary regulations in place to facilitate ICZM. Part of the previous regulation related to coastal management was repealed, meaning that the most relevant instruments of ICZM are struggling to move forward due to weak institutional capacity. It follows from the above that the coastal management model is at best confusing; implementation is slow and it returns poor results. With direct participation of coastal resource users and a leading role being played by local public administration, interesting efforts can be observed in relation to guiding coastal management in protected coastal zones.
Subjects
Legislation; Institutions and instruments; Integrated Coastal Zone Management
Collections
  • Artículos Científicos [11977]
  • Articulos Científicos Hist. Geog. Filos. [582]
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
This work is under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional

Browse

All of RODINCommunities and CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Información adicional

AboutDeposit in RODINPoliciesGuidelinesRightsLinksStatisticsNewsFrequently Asked Questions

RODIN is available through

OpenAIREOAIsterRecolectaHispanaEuropeanaBaseDARTOATDGoogle Academic

Related links

Sherpa/RomeoDulcineaROAROpenDOARCreative CommonsORCID

RODIN está gestionado por el Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz

Contact informationSuggestionsUser Support