Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMihaiescu Ion, Verónica 
dc.contributor.authorMoral Muñoz, José Antonio 
dc.contributor.authorLucena Antón, David Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorMartín Vega, Francisco Javier 
dc.contributor.authorRebollo-Salas, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorCarmona Barrientos, Inés María 
dc.contributor.otherEnfermería y Fisioterapiaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-25T07:15:39Z
dc.date.available2024-11-25T07:15:39Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn1529-8019
dc.identifier.issn1396-0296
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/33907
dc.description.abstractEdematous fibrosclerotic panniculopathy (EFP), commonly known as cellulite, is a cosmetic concern affecting a large percentage of women. Radiofrequency diathermy (RFD) and focused ultrasound (FUS) are noninvasive treatments proposed for the reduction of EFP. Objective. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of RFD versus FUS, both combined with intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) for the treatment of EFP in female thighs. Methods. A randomized intrasubject assessor-blind trial was conducted (NCT03474523) on 40 lower limbs of 20 women with EFP grades I, II, or III according to the Nürnberger & Müller scale. Each lower limb was randomly assigned to receive either seven RFD sessions or seven FUS sessions, both combined with IPC. Measurements were collected at baseline and post-treatment, including lower limb circumferences at different levels, weight, grade of EFP, and physical activity level. Results. Both RFD and FUS treatments, both combined with IPC, showed significant intragroup reduction in thigh circumference measurements for RFD at 15 cm (p=0.001), 20 cm (p=0.024), and midpoint (p=0.008) and for FUS at 15 cm (p=0.001), 20 cm (p=0.010), midpoint (p=0.008), 30 cm (p=0.020), and 40 cm (p=0.048). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two treatments. Weight did not change with treatment, and physical activity levels did not significantly affect EFP improvement. Conclusion. Both RFD and FUS, combined with IPC, were effective noninvasive methods for treating EFP. This study found that there was no significant difference between RFD and FUS in terms of efficacy in reducing EFP in the thighs. Therefore, both techniques can be used to treat EFP from a clinical perspective. Further studies with objective measurements are required to confirm these results and to guide clinical decision-making. This trial is registered with NCT03474523.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWiley-Hindawies_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceDermatologic Therapy - 2024, Vol. 2024, artículo n. 9179759es_ES
dc.subjectdiathermyes_ES
dc.subjectfocused ultrasound therapyes_ES
dc.subjectradiofrequency therapyes_ES
dc.subjectrandomized controlled triales_ES
dc.subjectcompression therapyes_ES
dc.titleEfficacy of Radiofrequency Diathermy versus Focused Ultrasound Therapy, Both Combined with Intermittent Pneumatic Compression, for Edematous Fibrosclerotic Panniculopathy Treatment: A Randomized Intrasubject Assessor-Blind Triales_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2024/9179759
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional