Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoreno Ligero, Marta 
dc.contributor.authorDueñas Rodríguez, María Ángeles 
dc.contributor.authorFailde Martínez, Inmaculada 
dc.contributor.authorDel Pino, Rogelio
dc.contributor.authorCoronilla, M Carmen
dc.contributor.authorMoral Muñoz, José Antonio 
dc.contributor.otherBiomedicina, Biotecnología y Salud Públicaes_ES
dc.contributor.otherEnfermería y Fisioterapiaes_ES
dc.contributor.otherEstadística e Investigación Operativaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-21T08:50:31Z
dc.date.available2025-01-21T08:50:31Z
dc.date.issued2024-10
dc.identifier.issn1532-821X
dc.identifier.issn0003-9993
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/34597
dc.description.abstractObjective To analyze the psychometric properties of the Pictorial Pain Interference Questionnaire (PPIQ) for evaluating functional interference in the population with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Rehabilitation Unit in a hospital. Participants Ninety-nine patients with CLBP. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Functional interference was assessed using PPIQ. The following data were also collected: sociodemographic data; pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale [NPRS]); physical functioning (30-s arm curl, 30-s chair stand [30CST], and timed Up and Go [TUG] tests), fitness (International Physical Activity Questionnaire); quality of life (Short-Form 12 Health Survey version 1 [SF-12v1]); sleep quality (Spanish-validated 12-item Medical Outcomes Study Sleep scale [12-MOS Sleep]); anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]); and social support (Duke-UNK Functional Social Support Questionnaire). Internal consistency was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha, structural validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and discriminant and convergent validity using bivariate analysis. Results Ninety-nine patients with CLBP were included (age [mean ± SD]: 54.37±12.44 y); women, 67.7%). The EFA extracted 2 factors: “physical function and “social and sleep,” which explained 57.75% of the variance. Excellent internal consistency was observed for the overall PPIQ score (Cronbach's α=0.866). Convergent validity was observed between the PPIQ and other functional measures (ρ: 0.52 and −0.47 for the TUG and 30CST, respectively; P<.001) and with the following variables: physical and mental component summaries of the SF-12v1 (ρ: −0. 55 and −0.52, respectively (P<.001); anxiety and depression of the HADS (ρ: 0.47 and 0.59, respectively (P<.001); NPRS (ρ: 0.45; P<.001); and index 9 of the 12-MOS Sleep scale (r: 0.49; P<.001). Conclusions The PPIQ is a valid instrument with good psychometric properties for measuring functional interference in people with CLBP. This questionnaire appears to be a feasible alternative when language or communication barriers exist in CLBP population.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation - 2024, Vol. 105 n.10 pp. 1870-1879es_ES
dc.titlePsychometric Properties of the Pictorial Pain Interference Questionnaire for Assessing Functional Interference in Chronic Low Back Paines_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apmr.2024.05.029
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
This work is under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional