Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJiménez García Carriazo, María de los Angeles 
dc.contributor.otherDerecho Internacional Público, Penal y Procesales_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-21T08:56:32Z
dc.date.available2025-01-21T08:56:32Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1946-6609
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/34598
dc.description.abstractThe Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS) has been analysing submissions for extension of the continental shelf for the last 20 years. As a scientific and technical body, the CLCS is mandated to examine the coastal states’ submissions according to geological and geomorphological criteria, which sometimes implies a qualitative reasoning that allows this panel to carry out its functions. In some other instances, the CLCS faces situations which require an interpretation beyond geophysical factors. Under those circumstances, the CLCS refrains from making interpretations as certain issues go beyond a scientific–technical assessment.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherRoutledgees_ES
dc.sourceMaritime Affairs 2022 18, n.º 1, pp. 1-11es_ES
dc.subjectContinental shelfes_ES
dc.subjectCLCSes_ES
dc.subjectsubmissiones_ES
dc.subjectUNCLOSes_ES
dc.subjectrecommendationses_ES
dc.subjectgeomorphologicales_ES
dc.titleSubmissions to the commission on the limits of the continental shelf: Practice and controversieses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09733159.2022.2080376
dc.type.hasVersionAMes_ES


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record