Neurocognitive assessment in microgravity: review of tools and benefits of increasing their clinical validity for long duration missions
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/35117
DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2023.2225235
ISSN: 1744-411X
Files
Statistics
Metrics and citations
Metadata
Show full item recordDate
2023Department
PsicologíaSource
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, Vol. 45, Núm. 3, 2023, pp. 270-291Abstract
Introduction: Clinical complications are not expected in current space missions; however, for
future long-duration missions to the Moon and Mars, a new perspective may be needed – a more
clinical approach. Different risks, both environmental, such as radiation, accidents, and biopsychological,
including neurological problems, represent potential sources of subsequent neurocognitive
deficits.
Aims: This study aims to review research studies published to this date in microgravity conditions
using existing spaceflight neurocognitive assessment batteries. This study also discusses the
different risks of neuropsychological impairment in spaceflight and the potential benefits of
increasing the clinical validity of these tools with neurological clinical samples on Earth for future
long-duration missions.
Method: A PRISMA guidelines-based review of specialized literature on neurocognitive assessment
batteries and human spaceflight was performed. Different factors including type of tool or battery
used, sample size, mission duration, etc. were included in this review. After the scrutiny of 192
articles, a total of 27 studies were detailed in the review outcome.
Results: Results showed that neuropsychological function research target has changed over the
years, with working memory and perception studies being predominant in the 80s and 90s while
reaction time being more frequent in recent research. We also found a lack of language-related
research in microgravity and the predominance of two neurocognitive assessment batteries in
microgravity research.
Conclusions: With this study, we want to emphasize the importance of increasing the clinical
validity of neurocognitive or neuropsychological assessment tools to be used in space, especially in
long-duration missions because in this type of mission the risk of suffering a brain injury or
neurological condition increases due to multiple factors. Testing these tools with neurological
clinical samples and using machine learning, predictive systems may help crews in early detection
of potential clinical, neurological, or neurocognitive problems during these long-duration missions
to Mars and beyond.
Collections
- Artículos Científicos [11973]





