Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDíaz Cano, Ignacio 
dc.contributor.authorMorgado Estévez, Arturo 
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Corral, José María 
dc.contributor.authorMedina Coello, Pablo 
dc.contributor.authorSalvador Domínguez, Blas 
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez Alcón, Miguel 
dc.contributor.otherIngeniería en Automática, Electrónica, Arquitectura y Redes de Computadoreses_ES
dc.contributor.otherIngeniería Informáticaes_ES
dc.contributor.otherIngeniería Mecánica y Diseño Industriales_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-04T12:29:17Z
dc.date.available2025-02-04T12:29:17Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-17
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/35336
dc.description.abstractThis work presents an automated welding inspection system based on a neural network trained through a series of 2D images of welding seams obtained in the same study. The object detection method follows a geometric deep learning model based on convolutional neural networks. Following an extensive review of available solutions, algorithms, and networks based on this convolutional strategy, it was determined that the You Only Look Once algorithm in its version 8 (YOLOv8) would be the most suitable for object detection due to its performance and features. Consequently, several models have been trained to enable the system to predict specific characteristics of weld beads. Firstly, the welding strategy used to manufacture the weld bead was predicted, distinguishing between two of them (Flux-Cored Arc Welding (FCAW)/Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW)), two of the predominant welding processes used in many industries, including shipbuilding, automotive, and aeronautics. In a subsequent experiment, the distinction between a well-manufactured weld bead and a defective one was predicted. In a final experiment, it was possible to predict whether a weld seam was well-manufactured or not, distinguishing between three possible welding defects. The study demonstrated high performance in three experiments, achieving top results in both binary classification (in the first two experiments) and multiclass classification (in the third experiment). The average prediction success rate exceeded 97% in all three experiments.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceApplied Sciences - 2025, Vol. 15 no. 2 artículo no. 899es_ES
dc.subjectCNNes_ES
dc.subjectsurface inspection weldinges_ES
dc.subjectshipbuildinges_ES
dc.subjectFCAWes_ES
dc.subjectGMAWes_ES
dc.subjectwelding defectses_ES
dc.subjectdeep learninges_ES
dc.subjectgeometric deep learninges_ES
dc.subjectYOLOes_ES
dc.titleAutomated Fillet Weld Inspection Based on Deep Learning from 2D Imageses_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.description.physDescArtículo de veinticuatro páginas.es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app15020899
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI//EQC2018-005190-Pes_ES
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
This work is under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional