Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorKreß, Jannis
dc.contributor.authorRau, Jens
dc.contributor.authorBehr, Ingo
dc.contributor.authorMohn, Bernd
dc.contributor.authorHebert, Hektor
dc.contributor.authorMorgado Estévez, Arturo 
dc.contributor.otherIngeniería en Automática, Electrónica, Arquitectura y Redes de Computadoreses_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-10T07:57:39Z
dc.date.available2025-03-10T07:57:39Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn0967-0661
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/35772
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the improvement of the exhaust gas composition by applying a velocity-controlled Throttle-by-Wire-System on modern 50 cc scooters (Euro 5). Nowadays combustion-powered scooters are still inefficiently restricted, resulting in an unreasonably high fuel consumption and unfavorable exhaust emissions. The velocity control prevents restriction by negatively shifting the ignition timing and regulates the throttle valve opening instead. Injection quantity, engine speed, ignition timing, cylinder wall and exhaust temperature, oxygen sensor data, crankshaft position and in-cylinder pressure were acquired to measure engine parameters. In parallel, vehicle CAN bus data, such as throttle opening, acceleration command and velocity were recorded. For determination of the exhaust gas composition, five probes were sensing CO, CO2, NOx, O2 and HC in addition to the temperature and mass flow. A Peugeot Kisbee 50 4T (Euro 5) serves as test vehicle. The original and the optimized restriction were subjected to various gradients on a roller dynamometer at top speed. Thus, a statement can be made about all restricted operating points. Required resistance parameters were determined in a coast down test. When driving on level ground, a difference of 50% in the throttle opening leads to a 17% improvement in fuel economy. By measuring the engine parameters, optimum ignition timing could be proven with increasing internal cylinder pressure. Further, 17% reduction in exhaust gas flow was demonstrated. CO emissions decreased by a factor of 8.4, CO2 by 1.17 and HC by 2.1 while NOx increased by a factor of 3.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.sourceControl Engineering Practice, Vol. 153, 2024es_ES
dc.subjectAlternative restrictinges_ES
dc.subjectFuel savinges_ES
dc.subjectMotorcycle powertraines_ES
dc.subjectThrottle-by-wirees_ES
dc.subjectVelocity controles_ES
dc.titleExhaust gas improvement of modern scooters by velocity controles_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/J.CONENGPRAC.2024.106111
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional