Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorBouakkaz, Abderraouf
dc.contributor.authorLahsasna, Adel
dc.contributor.authorGil Mena, Antonio José 
dc.contributor.authorHaddad, Salim
dc.contributor.authorFerrari, Mario Luigi
dc.contributor.authorJiménez Castaneda, Rafael 
dc.contributor.otherIngeniería Eléctricaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-27T09:05:21Z
dc.date.available2025-05-27T09:05:21Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.issn2252-4940
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/36372
dc.description.abstractSolar energy as a clean, renewable, and sustainable energy source has considerable potential to meet global energy needs. However, the intermittent and uncertain character of the solar energy source makes the power balance management a very challenging task. To overcome these shortcomings, providing accurate information about future energy production enables better planning, scheduling, and ensures effective strategies to meet energy demands. The present paper aims to assess the performance of PV power output forecasting in PV systems using various machine learning models, such as artificial neural networks (ANN), linear regression (LR), random forests (RF), and Support Vector Machines (SVM). These learning algorithms are trained on two different datasets with different time steps: in the first one, a historical weather forecast with a one hour time step, and in the second one, a dataset of on-site measurements with a 5-minute time step. To provide a reliable estimation of prediction accuracy for different learning algorithms, a k-fold cross-validation (CV) is applied. Through a comparison analysis, an assessment of the accuracy of these algorithms based on various metrics such as RMSE, MAE, and MRE is performed, providing a detailed evaluation of their performance. Results obtained from this study demonstrate that the random forest algorithm (RF) outperformed other algorithms in predicting PV output, achieving the smallest prediction error, where the best values for RMSE, MRE, MAE, and R² for the weather dataset were 0.856 W, 0.256%, 0.364 W, and 0.99999, respectively, while thevalues for RMSE, MRE, MAE, and R² for the on-site measurements dataset were 8.525 W, 11.163%, 3.922 W, and 0.99922, respectively.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherDiponegoro university Indonesia - Center of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)es_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Renewable Energy Development - 2025, Vol. 14 n. 1 pp. 158-167es_ES
dc.subjectSolar energyes_ES
dc.subjectPower productiones_ES
dc.subjectEnergy forecastinges_ES
dc.subjectMachine learninges_ES
dc.subjectCross-validationes_ES
dc.subjectAccuracy of predictionses_ES
dc.titleEvaluating and analyzing the performance of PV power output forecasting using different models of machine-learning techniques considering prediction accuracyes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.61435/IJRED.2025.60547
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional