Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMedina Polo, J.
dc.contributor.authorAlfonso Sánchez, J.L.
dc.contributor.authorArca Suárez, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorEstella García, Ángel 
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, P.
dc.contributor.authorBlasco, M.
dc.contributor.authorGil, A.
dc.contributor.authorPeriañez Párraga, L.D.M.
dc.contributor.authorMembrillo de Novales, F.J.
dc.contributor.otherMedicinaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-29T12:44:23Z
dc.date.available2025-05-29T12:44:23Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.issn2666-1683
dc.identifier.issn2666-1691
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/36415
dc.description.abstractBackground and objective: Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) are serious, potentially life-threatening infections that occur in patients with an increased disease progression risk. Antimicrobial resistance represents an important health issue worldwide, contributing to relapses, which can generate further resistances. It is necessary to clarify the role of microbiological eradication as an additional objective in the management of cUTIs. Some publications suggest that relapses relate to insufficient bacterial suppression in the urinary tract. This study focuses on generating a consensus on how patients with cUTIs would benefit from effective antimicrobial agents associated with higher rates of bacterial eradication. Methods: The nominal group technique was followed: systematic literature review, development of a questionnaire, expert panel meeting to discuss results, individual review of draft consensus document, and expert panel meeting to discuss final views and finalise the consensus document. Key findings and limitations: Experts identified risk factors for cUTIs (patients with a higher risk of relapse, physiological obstruction of urinary tract, immune suppression, and previous relapse), and patients who would benefit most from a therapeutic strategy combining clinical cure and aim for microbiological eradication. While experts agreed that the scientific evidence discourages repetition of urine cultures after treatment, they proposed recommendations to prioritise antibiotics with higher evidence of microbiological eradication and close follow-up in patients with a higher risk of relapse, considering any symptoms appearing following clinical cure of the cUTI. Conclusions and clinical implications: Selection of active antimicrobial agents associated with increased microbiological eradication should be prioritised in patients with cUTIs and a high risk of relapse. Patient summary: Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) occur in patients with an increased risk of disease progression or are caused by multidrug-resistant uropathogens. Antimicrobial resistance is of concern as it can result in relapses. Antimicrobial therapeutic strategies associated with increased microbiological eradication in cUTI patients with a high risk of relapse are crucial to prevent relapses and development of antibiotic resistance.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.es_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceEuropean Urology Open Science, Vol. 71, 2025, pp. 165-171es_ES
dc.subjectComplicated urinary tract infectionses_ES
dc.subjectConsensus documentes_ES
dc.subjectMicrobiological eradicationes_ES
dc.titleThe Importance of Antimicrobial Strategies Associated with Clinical Cure and Increased Microbiological Eradication in Patients with Complicated Urinary Tract Infections and High Risk of Relapsees_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.euros.2024.12.001
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
This work is under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional