Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFernández Alba, Juan Jesús 
dc.contributor.authorCarral, Florentino
dc.contributor.authorAyala Ortega, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorSantotoribio Camacho, José Diego
dc.contributor.authorCastillo Lara, María
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Macías, María del Carmen 
dc.contributor.authorSantotoribio Camacho
dc.contributor.otherBiomedicina, Biotecnología y Salud Públicaes_ES
dc.contributor.otherMaterno-Infantil y Radiologíaes_ES
dc.contributor.otherMedicinaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-13T07:44:54Z
dc.date.available2025-11-13T07:44:54Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.issn2075-4418
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/37881
dc.description.abstractThyroid cancer ranks among the most prevalent endocrine neoplasms, with a significant rise in incidence observed in recent decades, particularly in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). This increase is largely attributed to the enhanced detection of subclinical cancers through advanced imaging techniques and fineneedle aspiration biopsies. The present study aims to externally validate a predictive model previously developed by our group, designed to assess the risk of a thyroid nodule being malignant. Methods: By utilizing clinical, analytical, ultrasound, and histological data from patients treated at the Puerto Real University Hospital, this study seeks to evaluate the performance of the predictive model in a distinct dataset and perform a decision curve analysis to ascertain its clinical utility. Results: A total of 455 patients with thyroid nodular pathology were studied. Benign nodular pathology was diagnosed in 357 patients (78.46%), while 98 patients (21.54%) presented with a malignant tumor. The most frequent histological type of malignant tumor was papillary cancer (71.4%), followed by follicular cancer (6.1%). Malignant nodules were predominantly solid (95.9%), hypoechogenic (72.4%), with irregular or microlobed borders (36.7%), and associated with suspicious lymph nodes (24.5%). The decision curve analysis confirmed the model’s accuracy and its potential impact on clinical decision-making. Conclusions: The external validation of our predictive model demonstrates its robustness and generalizability across different populations and clinical settings. The integration of advanced diagnostic tools, such as AI and ML models, improves the accuracy in distinguishing between benign and malignant nodules, thereby optimizing treatment strategies and minimizing invasive procedures. This approach not only facilitates the early detection of cancer but also helps to avoid unnecessary surgeries and biopsies, ultimately reducing patient morbidity and healthcare costs.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceDiagnostics - 2025, Vol. 15 n. 6 pp. 1-12es_ES
dc.subjectthyroid canceres_ES
dc.subjectpredictive modeles_ES
dc.subjectdecision curve analysises_ES
dc.subjectpapillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC)es_ES
dc.subjectthyroid noduleses_ES
dc.subjectexternal validationes_ES
dc.subjectartificial intelligence (AI)es_ES
dc.subjectmachine learning (ML)es_ES
dc.subjectdiagnostic toolses_ES
dc.titleExternal Validation of a Predictive Model for Thyroid Cancer Risk with Decision Curve Analysises_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/DIAGNOSTICS15060686
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 Internacional
This work is under a Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 Internacional