| dc.contributor.author | Gilart Cantizano, Ester | |
| dc.contributor.author | Anna, Bocchino | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gilart-Cantizano, Patricia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cotobal-Calvo, Eva Manuela | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lepiani Díaz, Isabel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Román Sánchez, Daniel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Palazón-Fernández, José Luis | |
| dc.contributor.other | Enfermería y Fisioterapia | es_ES |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-11-20T10:57:03Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-11-20T10:57:03Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-05-27 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2039-4403 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2039-439X | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10498/37973 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background/Objectives: Nursing diagnosis is a complex process that requires
clinical judgment, time, and resources and whose implementation is hindered by factors
such as workload, lack of time, and resistance to computerized systems. This study aimed
to compare the quality and efficiency of care plans generated by nursing professionals versus those produced by an artificial intelligence (AI) model, using the NANDA, NOC, and
NIC taxonomies as criteria. Methods: An observational study was carried out with three
simulated clinical cases. Thirty experts, fifty-four nursing professionals, and the ChatGPT
model (GPT-4) were included. The experts established the referral plans using the Delphi
technique. Responses were evaluated with a validated rubric (EADE-2) and analyzed using
nonparametric tests. Professionals’ perceptions on the use of computer systems were also
collected. Results: ChatGPT scored significantly higher on several dimensions (p < 0.001)
and resolved all three cases in 35 s, compared to an average of 30 min for practitioners.
Professionals expressed dissatisfaction with current diagnostic documentation systems.
Conclusions: AI demonstrates high potential in optimizing the diagnostic process in nursing, although for its implementation human supervision, ethical aspects and improvements
in current systems must be considered to achieve effective integration. | es_ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | es_ES |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es_ES |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | es_ES |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 Internacional | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
| dc.source | Nursing Reports, Vol. 15, Núm. 6, 2025 | es_ES |
| dc.subject | expert panel | es_ES |
| dc.subject | nursing professionals | es_ES |
| dc.subject | artificial intelligence | es_ES |
| dc.subject | diagnostic process | es_ES |
| dc.title | The Integration of AI into the Nursing Process: A Comparative Analysis of NANDA, NOC, and NIC-Based Care Plans | es_ES |
| dc.type | journal article | es_ES |
| dc.rights.accessRights | open access | es_ES |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/nursrep15060186 | |
| dc.type.hasVersion | VoR | es_ES |