• español
    • English
  • Login
  • English 
    • español
    • English

UniversidaddeCádiz

Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones
Communities and Collections
View Item 
  •   RODIN Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • View Item
  •   RODIN Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Treatment of Neck Pain With Myofascial Therapies: A Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Identificadores

URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/38653

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.12.001

ISSN: 1532-6586

Files
Acceso Cerrado (1007.Kb)
Statistics
View statistics
Metrics and citations
 
Share
Export
Export reference to MendeleyRefworksEndNoteBibTexRIS
Metadata
Show full item record
Author/s
Rodríguez Huguet, ManuelAuthority UCA; Rodríguez-Almagro, Daniel; Rodríguez-Huguet, Pablo; Martín Valero, Rocío; Lomas Vega, Rafael
Date
2020
Department
Enfermería y Fisioterapia
Source
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics - 2020, Vol. 43, nº 2, pp. 160 - 170
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of myofascial release therapy vs a standard physical therapy program in patients with neck pain (NP). Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial in which 54 participants with mechanical NP were randomly assigned into an experimental group (EG) or a comparison group (CG). The EG group (n = 27) received 5 therapy sessions of myofascial release therapy while the CG group (n = 27) received 10 sessions of massage, ultrasound therapy, and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation over a 2-week period. Outcome measures were the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) and range of motion at the end of treatment and at 1-month follow-up. Results: At 1-month follow-up, between-group differences in change scores were found in the NPRS (mean = 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] [ 2.30 to 0.81]; P < .001), in the right thoracic PPT (mean = 0.35, 95% CI [0.03- 0.66]; P = .031), and in both left (mean = 0.34, 95% CI [0.08-0.61]; P = .012) and right (mean = 0.29, 95% CI [0.04- 0.54]; P = .026) suboccipital PPTs. The success rate was 63.0% in the CG and 92.6% in the EG. The number needed to treat was 3.38 (95% CI = 1.99-11.23). Conclusions: Myofascial release therapy could be better than a standard physical therapy program for improving pain and suboccipital PPTs in patients with NP. However, the difference between both
Subjects
Fascia; Physical Therapy Modalities; Range of Motion
Collections
  • Artículos Científicos [11954]
  • Articulos Científicos Enf. Fisio. [324]

Browse

All of RODINCommunities and CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Información adicional

AboutDeposit in RODINPoliciesGuidelinesRightsLinksStatisticsNewsFrequently Asked Questions

RODIN is available through

OpenAIREOAIsterRecolectaHispanaEuropeanaBaseDARTOATDGoogle Academic

Related links

Sherpa/RomeoDulcineaROAROpenDOARCreative CommonsORCID

RODIN está gestionado por el Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz

Contact informationSuggestionsUser Support