Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorRomero Martínez, Leonardo 
dc.contributor.authorPrieto-Pérez-Juez, Amalia
dc.contributor.authorNebot Sanz, Enrique 
dc.contributor.authorMoreno Andrés, Javier 
dc.contributor.otherTecnologías del Medio Ambientees_ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-17T06:42:47Z
dc.date.available2026-04-17T06:42:47Z
dc.date.issued2025-09-30
dc.identifier.issn2296-7745
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/39282
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The Vibrio genus includes aquatic bacteria from freshwater, estuarine, and marine environments, some of which pose significant risks to public and environmental health, highlighting the need for effective disinfection strategies. This study investigated the inactivation kinetics, reactivation potential, and energy efficiency of UV-LEDs emitting at 265 nm and 275 nm for controlling Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio parahaemolyticus, two emerging marine pathogens. Methods: Bacteria were exposed to UV irradiation under different post-treatment conditions (0 d, 1 d-dark, 1 d-light), and both inactivation rate constants (k, mJ·cm-2) and electrical energy per n-log reduction (EEL,n) were obtained and analyzed. Results and discussion: Results showed that V. parahaemolyticus was more UV-sensitive than V. alginolyticus, with inactivation rate constants of 1.22 and 1.60 cm2·mJ-1 at 265 and 275 nm, respectively, compared to 0.82 and 0.69 cm2·mJ-1 for V. alginolyticus. No significant differences were observed between the two wavelengths (265 nm and 275 nm) in terms of inactivation rate constants. As a result, achieving a 2-log reduction required lower fluences for V. parahaemolyticus (3.68–2.89 mJ·cm-2) than for V. alginolyticus (5.53–6.85 mJ·cm-2). Post-treatment incubation caused a decline in k-values one day after UV exposure, particularly under light conditions, with reductions of up to 59.9% at 275 nm and 48.8% at 265 nm. Although the decrease in k-values under dark conditions was less pronounced (average 27.9%), it remains noteworthy when compared with other fecal bacterial indicators. Electrical energy analyses revealed lower EEL,1 values at 275 nm, indicating greater energy efficiency, with values ranging from 0.012 to 0.050 kWh·m-3 for both Vibrio species. These results support the need for wavelength-specific optimization to balance disinfection efficacy and energy efficiency in marine water treatment and seafood safety applications.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherFrontierses_ES
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceFrontiers in Marine Science, Vol. 12, 2025es_ES
dc.subjectmarine disinfectiones_ES
dc.subjectemerging waterborne pathogenses_ES
dc.subjectbacterial repaires_ES
dc.subjectLED-based water treatmentes_ES
dc.subjectspecies-specific inactivationes_ES
dc.subjectaquaculture biosecurityes_ES
dc.subjectmarine pathogen controles_ES
dc.titleUV-LED disinfection of emerging Vibrio pathogens: inactivation kinetics and reactivation potentiales_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/FMARS.2025.1608367
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution 4.0 Internacional
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internacional