Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGóngora Rodríguez, Jorge Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Huguet, Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Almagro, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorMartín Valero, Rocío
dc.contributor.authorGóngora-Rodríguez, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorAyala Martínez, Carmen María 
dc.contributor.authorRosety Rodríguez, Miguel Ángel 
dc.contributor.otherDidáctica de la Educación Física, Plástica y Musicales_ES
dc.contributor.otherEnfermería y Fisioterapiaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-22T12:48:20Z
dc.date.available2026-04-22T12:48:20Z
dc.date.issued2025-07
dc.identifier.issn2411-5142
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/39368
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of Percutaneous Electrolysis (PE), Percutaneous peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS), and Eccentric Exercise (EE) in patients with supraspinatus tendinopathy. Methods: Forty-six participants with supraspinatus tendinopathy were randomly allocated to either an invasive therapy group (four sessions in four weeks of PE+PNS and EE program) or a conventional physical therapy group (ten sessions for 2 weeks). The multimodal physical program included Ultrasound therapy (US), Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and the same EE program. The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), shoulder Range of Motion (ROM), Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), and disability (DASH and SPADI) were measured at baseline, at the end of treatment, and at 12- and 24-weeks follow-up. Results: The PE+PNS+EE group demonstrated consistently greater and statistically significant improvements across nearly all pain, mobility, and functional outcomes at all follow-up points (post-treatment, 12-weeks, and 24-weeks) compared to the TENS+US+EE group, with generally medium to large effect sizes. Conclusions: This study concludes that the combined PE+PNS+EE intervention offers safe and effective treatment for supraspinatus tendinopathy, demonstrating statistically significant improvements in pain, mobility, and function compared to conventional electrotherapy.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceJournal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology - 2025, Vol. 10, Núm. 3, 295es_ES
dc.subjecteccentric exercisees_ES
dc.subjectpercutaneous electrolysises_ES
dc.subjectperipheral nerve stimulationes_ES
dc.subjectphysical therapyes_ES
dc.subjectrehabilitationes_ES
dc.subjectsupraspinatus tendinopathyes_ES
dc.titlePercutaneous Electrolysis, Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation, and Eccentric Exercise for Shoulder Pain and Functionality in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Triales_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/JFMK10030295
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
This work is under a Creative Commons License Atribución 4.0 Internacional