RT journal article
T1 Corrigendum to “UV-LEDs combined with persulfate salts as a method to inactivate microalgae in ballast water”
A1 Rivas Zaballos, Ignacio
A1 Romero Martínez, Leonardo
A1 Moreno Garrido, Ignacio
A1 Moreno Andrés, Javier
A1 Acevedo Merino, Asunción
A1 Nebot Sanz, Enrique
A2 Tecnologías del Medio Ambiente
AB he authors regret to report the following errors: In Table 6, the doses of the UVB LEDs were interchanged with respect to a period of 0d and 5d of dark post-treatment. The correct version should be as follows [Table presented] As a result of this data exchange, two percentages in Section 3.2.4 were also modified. The correct versions are: Paragraph four (lines 4–8): Without a dark post-treatment, UVC LEDs were 81.9 % more efficient than UVB LEDs and 48.1 % more efficient than UVC LP mercury lamps. With a five day dark post-treatment, the UVC LEDs were 85.8 % more efficient than UVB LEDs and 36.8 % more efficient than UVC LP mercury lamps. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused
PB ELSEVIER
SN 2214-7144
YR 2023
FD 2023-07
LK http://hdl.handle.net/10498/29567
UL http://hdl.handle.net/10498/29567
LA eng
DS Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Cádiz
RD 06-nov-2026