RT journal article
T1 Assessment of satellite-derived shorelines automatically extracted from Sentinel-2 imagery using SAET
A1 Pardo-Pascual, Josep E.
A1 Almonacid-Caballer, J.
A1 Cabezas-Rabadán, Carlos
A1 Fernández-Sarría, Alfonso
A1 Armaroli, Clara
A1 Ciavola, Paolo
A1 Montes Pérez, Juan Bautista
A1 Souto Ceccon, Paola E.
A1 Palomar-Vazquez, Jesús
A2 Ciencias de la Tierra
AB The definition of the shoreline position from satellite imagery is of great interest among coastal monitoring techniques. Understanding the reality mapped by the resulting shorelines and defining their accuracy is of paramount importance. The assessment described in this paper constitutes a validation of the shorelines obtained by using the novel tool SAET (Shoreline Analysis and Extraction Tool) for automatic shoreline extraction. The resulting shorelines applying the different parameters available in SAET are assessed in 9 test sites with diverse morphology and oceanographic conditions along the Atlantic European and Western Mediterranean coasts. The reference data is obtained along large coastal segments (covering up to about 240 km) from nearly coincident very high-resolution satellite images. Different image processing levels and extraction methods have been tested, showing their key role in the accuracy of shoreline position. When defining the approximate shoreline position the Automated Water Extraction Index for images without shadows (AWEInsh) with a 0 threshold generally constitutes the best segmentation method. In turn, the employment of the mathematical morphological operations of dilation or erosion considerably improves the results in certain coastal typologies. On the contrary, the employment of atmospherically-corrected images has a smaller influence on the accuracy of the SDSs. Results support the idea that the magnitude of the errors is strongly related to the specific coastal conditions- In general, the lowest errors appear in low-energetic microtidal sites, contrary to the energetic and mesotidal coasts with gentle slopes. The shoreline errors range between 3.7 m and 13.5 m RMSE (root-mean-square error) among the different coastal types when selecting the most appropriate extraction parameters. The shoreline position identified with SAET shows a similar or better accuracy to that obtained by other tools.
PB Elsevier B.V.
SN 0378-3839
YR 2024
FD 2024
LK http://hdl.handle.net/10498/31947
UL http://hdl.handle.net/10498/31947
LA eng
DS Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Cádiz
RD 21-sep-2026