RT journal article
T1 Sex differences in treatment strategies for pulmonary embolism in older adults: The SERIOUS-PE study of RIETE participants and US Medicare beneficiaries
A1 Bikdeli, Behnood
A1 Leyva, Hannah
A1 Muriel, Alfonso
A1 Lin, Zhenqiu
A1 Piazza, Gregory
A1 Khairani, Candrika D
A1 Rosovsky, Rachel P.
A1 Mehdipour, Ghazaleh
A1 O’Donoghue, Michelle L.
A1 Madridano, Olga
A1 López Sáez, José Juan Bosco
A1 Mellado, Meritxell
A1 Diaz Brasero, Ana Maria
A1 Grandone, Elvira
A1 Spagnolo, Primavera A.
A1 Lu, Yuan
A1 Bertoletti, Laurent
A1 López-Jiménez, Luciano
A1 Núñez, Manuel Jesús
A1 Blanco-Molina, Ángeles
A1 Gerhard-Herman, Marie
A1 Goldhaber, Samuel Z.
A1 Bates, Shannon M.
A1 Jimenez, David
A1 Krumholz, Harlan M.
A1 Monreal, Manuel
A2 Cirugía
A2 Medicina
K1 anticoagulation
K1 elderly
K1 pulmonary embolism (PE)
K1 risk factors
K1 sex differences
K1 venous thromboembolism (VTE)
AB Introduction:Sex differences exist in risk factors and comorbidities of older adults (aged ⩾ 65 years) with pulmonary embolism (PE). Clinically relevant sex-based treatment disparities for PE have not been adequately addressed. The few existing show conflicting results due to small sample size (type II error) and suboptimal methods (overreliance on p-value, which may detect differences of small clinical relevance).Methods:We assessed sex differences in anticoagulation and advanced therapies for PE in older adults, utilizing data from Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbolica (RIETE), a large PE registry with predominant participation from Europe, and data from US Medicare beneficiaries. We prespecified a standardized difference (SRD) > 10% as clinically relevant. RIETE included 33,462 (57.7% female) and Medicare included 102,391 (55.0% female) older adults with PE.Results:In RIETE, there were no overall sex differences in the use of anticoagulation (median: 181 vs 180 days, SRD < 1%), fibrinolysis (SRD < 3%), thrombectomy (SRD < 2%), or inferior vena cava (IVC) filters (SRD: 4.4%). However, fibrinolytic therapy (systemic or catheter-based) was less often used in female than male patients with intermediate-risk PE (8.0% vs 12.1%, SRD: 13.6%). No sex differences were noted with advanced PE therapies in Medicare beneficiaries. In unadjusted analyses, fibrinolysis and IVC filter placement were more frequent in Medicare than RIETE participants regardless of sex (p < 0.001).Conclusion:In a predominantly European PE registry and a US study of older adults, there were no overall sex differences in anticoagulation patterns or advanced therapy utilization. Future studies should determine if sex disparities in fibrinolytic therapy for intermediate-risk PE and greater use of advanced therapies in US older adults correlate with clinical outcomes.
PB SAGE
SN 1358-863X
YR 2025
FD 2025-02
LK http://hdl.handle.net/10498/38232
UL http://hdl.handle.net/10498/38232
LA eng
DS Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Cádiz
RD 06-nov-2026