• español
    • English
  • Login
  • español 
    • español
    • English

UniversidaddeCádiz

Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones
Comunidades y colecciones
Ver ítem 
  •   RODIN Principal
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • Ver ítem
  •   RODIN Principal
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Measuring the quality of mobile applications for the management of pain: a standardised review using the mobile app rating scale (MARS)

Thumbnail
Identificadores

URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/20835

DOI: 10.2196/10718

ISSN: 2291-5222

Ficheros
jmir-chronicpain.pdf (601.6Kb)
Estadísticas
Ver estadísticas
Métricas y Citas
 
Compartir
Exportar a
Exportar a MendeleyRefworksEndNoteBibTexRIS
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor/es
Salazar Couso, AlejandroAutoridad UCA; Sola Perea, Helena deAutoridad UCA; Failde Martínez, InmaculadaAutoridad UCA; Moral Muñoz, José AntonioAutoridad UCA
Fecha
2018-10-25
Departamento/s
Enfermería y Fisioterapia
Fuente
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018 , vol. 6 n. 10
Resumen
Background: Chronic pain is a major health issue requiring an approach that not only considers medication, but also many other factors included in the Bio-Psycho-Social model of pain. New technologies, such as mobile applications, are tools to address these factors, although in many cases they lack proven quality or are not based on scientific evidence, so it is necessary to review and measure their quality. Objective: The aim is to review and measure the quality of mobile applications for the management of pain using the mobile app rating scale (MARS). Methods: This review included 18 pain related mobile apps from App Store and Android Market. The MARS was administered to measure their quality. We list the scores (of each section and the final score) of every app and we report the mean score (and standard deviation) for an overall vision of the quality of the pain related apps. We compare the section scores between the groups defined according to the tertiles via ANOVA analyses, after checking for normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test). Results: The global quality ranged from 1.74 (worst app) to 4.35 (best app). The 18 apps, as a whole, obtained an average score of 3.17 (SD=0.75). The best rated sections were “Functionality” (Mean=3.92;SD=0.72), “Aesthetics” (Mean=3.3;SD=1.05), and “Engagement” (Mean=2.87;SD=1.14), while the worst rated were “App specific” (Mean=2.48;SD=1), “Information” (Mean=2.52;SD=0.82), and “App subjective quality” (Mean=2.68;SD=1.22). The main differences between tertiles were found on “app subjective quality”, “Engagement”, “Aesthetics”, and “App specific”. Conclusions: Current pain related apps are of a certain quality, mainly regarding their technical aspects, although they fail to offer information and have an impact on the user. Most apps are not based on scientific evidence, have not been rigorously tested, and the confidentiality of the information collected is not guaranteed. Future apps would need to improve these aspects and exploit the capabilities of current devices.
Colecciones
  • Artículos Científicos [11777]
  • Articulos Científicos Enf. Fisio. [320]
  • Artículos Científicos INIBICA [1083]

Listar

Todo RODINComunidades y ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMaterias

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Información adicional

Acerca de...Deposita en RODINPolíticasNormativasDerechos de autorEnlaces de interésEstadísticasNovedadesPreguntas frecuentes

RODIN está accesible a través de

OpenAIREOAIsterRecolectaHispanaEuropeanaBaseDARTOATDGoogle Académico

Enlaces de interés

Sherpa/RomeoDulcineaROAROpenDOARCreative CommonsORCID

RODIN está gestionado por el Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz

ContactoSugerenciasAtención al Usuario