• español
    • English
  • Login
  • español 
    • español
    • English

UniversidaddeCádiz

Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones
Comunidades y colecciones
Ver ítem 
  •   RODIN Principal
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • Ver ítem
  •   RODIN Principal
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Effectiveness of Percutaneous Electrolysis in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Thumbnail
Identificadores

URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/23608

DOI: 10.3390/jcm9061837

ISSN: 2077-0383

Ficheros
2020_402.pdf (1.669Mb)
Estadísticas
Ver estadísticas
Métricas y Citas
 
Compartir
Exportar a
Exportar a MendeleyRefworksEndNoteBibTexRIS
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor/es
Rodríguez Huguet, ManuelAutoridad UCA; Góngora Rodríguez, Jorge ManuelAutoridad UCA; Rodríguez-Huguet, Pablo; Ibañez-Vera, Alfonso Javier; Rodríguez-Almagro, Daniel; Martín Valero, Rocío; Díaz-Fernández, Ángeles; Lomas-Vega, Rafael
Fecha
2020-06
Departamento/s
Enfermería y Fisioterapia
Fuente
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(6), 1837
Resumen
Supraspinatus tendinopathy is one of the most common causes of shoulder pain. Many studies support conservative treatments such as exercise, trigger point dry needling or corticosteroid injections. Otherwise, a minimally invasive approach with percutaneous electrolysis (PE) has also been used successfully in shoulder pain, although evidence about its long-term effects is scarce. The aim of this trial was to determine the effects of PE on supraspinatus tendinopathy compared with trigger point dry needling (TDN). Thirty-six patients with supraspinatus tendinopathy were randomly assigned to either a PE group (n=18) or a TDN group (n=18). Both groups also performed eccentric exercises. The main outcome to be measured was the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), but the shoulder range of motion (ROM) and trigger point pressure pain threshold (PPT) were also considered. A one-year follow-up was conducted. Significant differences favoring the PE group were found regarding pain at one-year follow-up (p=0.002). The improvement achieved in the PE group was greater in the NPRS (p<0.001), proximal PPT, middle PPT, distal PPT (all p<0.001) and ranges of movement. PE seems to be more effective than TDN in relieving pain and improving ROM and PPT supraspinatus values in patients with supraspinatus tendinopathy, both right after treatment and at one-year follow-up.
Materias
supraspinatus tendinopathy; percutaneous electrolysis; trigger point dry needling; shoulder pain
Colecciones
  • Artículos Científicos [12009]
  • Articulos Científicos Enf. Fisio. [325]
Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional

Listar

Todo RODINComunidades y ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMaterias

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Información adicional

Acerca de...Deposita en RODINPolíticasNormativasDerechos de autorEnlaces de interésEstadísticasNovedadesPreguntas frecuentes

RODIN está accesible a través de

OpenAIREOAIsterRecolectaHispanaEuropeanaBaseDARTOATDGoogle Académico

Enlaces de interés

Sherpa/RomeoDulcineaROAROpenDOARCreative CommonsORCID

RODIN está gestionado por el Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz

ContactoSugerenciasAtención al Usuario