Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Huguet, Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorGóngora Rodríguez, Jorge Manuel 
dc.contributor.authorLomas-Vega, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorMartín Valero, Rocío
dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Fernández, Ángeles
dc.contributor.authorObrero-Gaitán, Esteban
dc.contributor.authorIbáñez-Vera, Alfonso Javier
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Almagro, Daniel
dc.contributor.otherEnfermería y Fisioterapiaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-28T09:56:09Z
dc.date.available2020-09-28T09:56:09Z
dc.date.issued2020-07
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/23655
dc.description.abstractFew studies have considered the effects of percutaneous electrolysis (PE) in the treatment of lateral epicondylalgia (LE). For this reason, the objective of this study was to compare the effects of PE with an evidence-based approach-trigger point dry needling (TDN)-in patients with LE. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in which 32 participants with LE were randomly assigned to two treatment groups, the PE group (n= 16) and the TDN group (n= 16). Both groups received four therapy sessions and an eccentric exercise program to be performed daily. The numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), pressure pain thresholds (PPT), quality of life, and range of motion were measured before treatment, at the end of treatment, and at one- and three-month follow-ups. Significant between-group mean differences were found after treatment for NPRS (p< 0.001) and flexion movement (p= 0.006). At one-month follow-up, significant mean differences between groups were found for NPRS (p< 0.001), PPT (p= 0.021), and flexion (p= 0.036). At three-months follow-up, significant mean differences between groups were found for NPRS (p< 0.001), PPT (p= 0.004), and flexion (p= 0.003). This study provides evidence that PE could be more effective than TDN for short- and medium-term improvement of pain and PPTs in LE when added to an eccentric exercise program.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceJ. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(7), 2068es_ES
dc.subjectelectrolysises_ES
dc.subjectelbow tendinopathyes_ES
dc.subjecttennis elbowes_ES
dc.subjectlateral epicondylitises_ES
dc.subjectlateral epicondylalgiaes_ES
dc.subjectphysical therapyes_ES
dc.titlePercutaneous Electrolysis in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylalgia: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Triales_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm9072068


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional