• español
    • English
  • Login
  • English 
    • español
    • English

UniversidaddeCádiz

Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones
Communities and Collections
View Item 
  •   RODIN Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • View Item
  •   RODIN Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Percutaneous Electrolysis in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylalgia: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Thumbnail
Identificadores

URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/23655

DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072068

ISSN: 2077-0383

Files
2020_430.pdf (3.031Mb)
Statistics
View statistics
Metrics and citations
 
Share
Export
Export reference to MendeleyRefworksEndNoteBibTexRIS
Metadata
Show full item record
Author/s
Rodríguez Huguet, ManuelAuthority UCA; Góngora Rodríguez, Jorge ManuelAuthority UCA; Lomas-Vega, Rafael; Martín Valero, Rocío; Díaz-Fernández, Ángeles; Obrero-Gaitán, Esteban; Ibáñez-Vera, Alfonso Javier; Rodríguez-Almagro, Daniel
Date
2020-07
Department
Enfermería y Fisioterapia
Source
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(7), 2068
Abstract
Few studies have considered the effects of percutaneous electrolysis (PE) in the treatment of lateral epicondylalgia (LE). For this reason, the objective of this study was to compare the effects of PE with an evidence-based approach-trigger point dry needling (TDN)-in patients with LE. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in which 32 participants with LE were randomly assigned to two treatment groups, the PE group (n= 16) and the TDN group (n= 16). Both groups received four therapy sessions and an eccentric exercise program to be performed daily. The numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), pressure pain thresholds (PPT), quality of life, and range of motion were measured before treatment, at the end of treatment, and at one- and three-month follow-ups. Significant between-group mean differences were found after treatment for NPRS (p< 0.001) and flexion movement (p= 0.006). At one-month follow-up, significant mean differences between groups were found for NPRS (p< 0.001), PPT (p= 0.021), and flexion (p= 0.036). At three-months follow-up, significant mean differences between groups were found for NPRS (p< 0.001), PPT (p= 0.004), and flexion (p= 0.003). This study provides evidence that PE could be more effective than TDN for short- and medium-term improvement of pain and PPTs in LE when added to an eccentric exercise program.
Subjects
electrolysis; elbow tendinopathy; tennis elbow; lateral epicondylitis; lateral epicondylalgia; physical therapy
Collections
  • Artículos Científicos [11777]
  • Articulos Científicos Enf. Fisio. [320]
Atribución 4.0 Internacional
This work is under a Creative Commons License Atribución 4.0 Internacional

Browse

All of RODINCommunities and CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Información adicional

AboutDeposit in RODINPoliciesGuidelinesRightsLinksStatisticsNewsFrequently Asked Questions

RODIN is available through

OpenAIREOAIsterRecolectaHispanaEuropeanaBaseDARTOATDGoogle Academic

Related links

Sherpa/RomeoDulcineaROAROpenDOARCreative CommonsORCID

RODIN está gestionado por el Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz

Contact informationSuggestionsUser Support