• español
    • English
  • Login
  • español 
    • español
    • English

UniversidaddeCádiz

Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones
Comunidades y colecciones
Ver ítem 
  •   RODIN Principal
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • Ver ítem
  •   RODIN Principal
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Percutaneous Electrolysis in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylalgia: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Thumbnail
Identificadores

URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/23655

DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072068

ISSN: 2077-0383

Ficheros
2020_430.pdf (3.031Mb)
Estadísticas
Ver estadísticas
Métricas y Citas
 
Compartir
Exportar a
Exportar a MendeleyRefworksEndNoteBibTexRIS
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor/es
Rodríguez Huguet, ManuelAutoridad UCA; Góngora Rodríguez, Jorge ManuelAutoridad UCA; Lomas-Vega, Rafael; Martín Valero, Rocío; Díaz-Fernández, Ángeles; Obrero-Gaitán, Esteban; Ibáñez-Vera, Alfonso Javier; Rodríguez-Almagro, Daniel
Fecha
2020-07
Departamento/s
Enfermería y Fisioterapia
Fuente
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(7), 2068
Resumen
Few studies have considered the effects of percutaneous electrolysis (PE) in the treatment of lateral epicondylalgia (LE). For this reason, the objective of this study was to compare the effects of PE with an evidence-based approach-trigger point dry needling (TDN)-in patients with LE. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in which 32 participants with LE were randomly assigned to two treatment groups, the PE group (n= 16) and the TDN group (n= 16). Both groups received four therapy sessions and an eccentric exercise program to be performed daily. The numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), pressure pain thresholds (PPT), quality of life, and range of motion were measured before treatment, at the end of treatment, and at one- and three-month follow-ups. Significant between-group mean differences were found after treatment for NPRS (p< 0.001) and flexion movement (p= 0.006). At one-month follow-up, significant mean differences between groups were found for NPRS (p< 0.001), PPT (p= 0.021), and flexion (p= 0.036). At three-months follow-up, significant mean differences between groups were found for NPRS (p< 0.001), PPT (p= 0.004), and flexion (p= 0.003). This study provides evidence that PE could be more effective than TDN for short- and medium-term improvement of pain and PPTs in LE when added to an eccentric exercise program.
Materias
electrolysis; elbow tendinopathy; tennis elbow; lateral epicondylitis; lateral epicondylalgia; physical therapy
Colecciones
  • Artículos Científicos [11977]
  • Articulos Científicos Enf. Fisio. [325]
Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional

Listar

Todo RODINComunidades y ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMaterias

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Información adicional

Acerca de...Deposita en RODINPolíticasNormativasDerechos de autorEnlaces de interésEstadísticasNovedadesPreguntas frecuentes

RODIN está accesible a través de

OpenAIREOAIsterRecolectaHispanaEuropeanaBaseDARTOATDGoogle Académico

Enlaces de interés

Sherpa/RomeoDulcineaROAROpenDOARCreative CommonsORCID

RODIN está gestionado por el Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz

ContactoSugerenciasAtención al Usuario