A critical review on altmetrics: can we measure the social impact factor?

Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/25581
DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01033-2
ISSN: 1869-4101
Ficheros
Estadísticas
Métricas y Citas
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítemAutor/es
García Villar, Cristina
Fecha
2021-07Departamento/s
Materno-Infantil y RadiologíaFuente
Insights Imaging 12, 92 (2021)Resumen
Altmetrics measure the digital attention received by a research output. They allow us to gauge the immediate social
impact of an article by taking real-time measurements of how it circulates in the Internet. While there are several
companies offering attention scores, the most extensive are Altmetric.com (Altmetric Attention Score—AAS) and
Plum X (Plum Print). As this is an emerging topic, many medical specialities have tried to establish if there is a relationship
between an article’s altmetric data and the citations it subsequently receives. The results have varied depending
on the research field. In radiology, the social network most used is Twitter and the subspeciality with the highest
AAS is neuroimaging. This article will review the process involved from the start when an article is published through
to finally obtaining its altmetric score. It will also address the relationship between altmetrics and more traditional
approaches focusing on citations in radiology and will discuss the advantages and limitations of these new impact
indicators.
Materias
Altmetrics; Bibliometric indicators; Radiology; Medical imaging; Social mediaColecciones
- Artículos Científicos [11777]
- Articulos Científicos Mat. Inf. Rad. [131]





