Self-criticisms toward a socially responsible science in the field of management

Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/26225
DOI: 10.1177/23409444211062230
ISSN: 2340-9436
ISSN: 2340-9444
Files
Statistics
Metrics and citations
Metadata
Show full item recordDate
2021-12Department
Organización de EmpresasSource
Business Research Quarterly 1– 34Abstract
Management scholarship should be placed in a unique position to develop relevant scientific knowledge because business
and management organizations are deeply involved in most global challenges. However, different critical voices have
recently been raised in essays and editorials, and reports have questioned research in the management field, identifying
multiple deficiencies that can limit the growth of a relatively young field. Based on an analysis of published criticisms
of management research, we would like to shed light on the current state of management research and identify some
limitations that should be considered and should guide the growth of this field of knowledge. This work offers guidance
on the main problems of the discipline that should be addressed to encourage the transformation of management
research to meet both scientific rigor and social relevance. The article ends with a discussion and a call to action for
directing research toward the possibility and necessity of reinforcing “responsible research” in the management field.
Subjects
Management field; management research; Valley of Death; academic reward system; socially responsible scienceCollections
- Artículos Científicos [11977]
- Articulos Científicos Org. Emp. [291]






