Corrigendum to “UV-LEDs combined with persulfate salts as a method to inactivate microalgae in ballast water”

Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/29567
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.103361
ISSN: 2214-7144
Statistics
Metrics and citations
Metadata
Show full item recordDate
2023-07Department
Tecnologías del Medio AmbienteSource
Journal of Water Process Engineering Volume 53, July 2023, 103672Abstract
he authors regret to report the following errors: In Table 6, the doses of the UVB LEDs were interchanged with respect to a period of 0d and 5d of dark post-treatment. The correct version should be as follows [Table presented] As a result of this data exchange, two percentages in Section 3.2.4 were also modified. The correct versions are: Paragraph four (lines 4–8): Without a dark post-treatment, UVC LEDs were 81.9 % more efficient than UVB LEDs and 48.1 % more efficient than UVC LP mercury lamps. With a five day dark post-treatment, the UVC LEDs were 85.8 % more efficient than UVB LEDs and 36.8 % more efficient than UVC LP mercury lamps. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused
Collections
- Artículos Científicos [11954]
- Artículos Científicos INMAR [1040]
- Articulos Científicos Tec. Med. Amb. [215]






