Biofiltration of gaseous mixtures of dimethyl sulfide, dimethyl disulfide and dimethyl trisulfide: Effect of operational conditions and microbial analysis

Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/33517
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121320
ISSN: 1095-8630
ISSN: 0301-4797
Statistics
Metrics and citations
Metadata
Show full item recordDate
2024-05-30Department
Ingeniería Química y Tecnología de AlimentosSource
Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 362, 2024Abstract
The efficient removal of volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs), such as dimethyl sulfide (DMS), dimethyl disulfide
(DMDS) and dimethyl trisulfide (DMTS), is crucial due to their foul odor and corrosive potential in sewer systems. Biofilters (BFs) offer promise for VSCs removal, but face challenges related to pH control and changing
conditions at full scale. Two BFs, operated under acidophilic conditions for 78 days, were evaluated for their
performance at varying inlet concentrations and empty bed residence times (EBRTs). BF1, incorporating 4–6 mm
marble limestone for pH control, outperformed BF2, which used NaHCO3 in the nutrient solution. BF1 displayed
better resilience, maintained a stable pH of 4.6 ± 0.6, and achieved higher maximum elimination capacities
(ECmax, 41 mg DMS m− 3 h− 1 (RE 38.3%), 146 mg DMDS m− 3 h− 1 (RE 83.1%), 47 mg DMTS m− 3 h− 1 (RE 93.1%))
at an EBRT of 56 s compared to BF2 (9 mg DMS m− 3 h− 1 (RE 7.1%), 9 mg DMDS m− 3 h− 1 (RE 4.8%) and 11 mg
DMTS m− 3 h− 1 (RE 26.6%)). BF2 exhibited pH stratification and decreased performance after feeding interruptions. The biodegradability of VSCs followed the order DMTS > DMDS > DMS, and several microorganisms
were identified contributing to VSCs degradation in BF1, including Bacillus (14%), Mycobacterium (11%), Acidiphilium (7%), and Acidobacterium (3%).
Subjects
DMS; DMDS; DMTS; VSC; Biofilter; pH; Sewer; OdorCollections
- Artículos Científicos [11954]
- Articulos Científicos Ing. Quim. [312]






