• español
    • English
  • Login
  • español 
    • español
    • English

UniversidaddeCádiz

Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones
Comunidades y colecciones
Ver ítem 
  •   RODIN Principal
  • Producción Científica
  • Contribuciones a Seminario o Congreso
  • Ver ítem
  •   RODIN Principal
  • Producción Científica
  • Contribuciones a Seminario o Congreso
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Combining Evolutionary Mutation Testing with Random Selection

Thumbnail
Identificadores

URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/38835

DOI: 10.1109/CEC48606.2020.9185618

Ficheros
Artículo principal (207.2Kb)
Estadísticas
Ver estadísticas
Métricas y Citas
 
Compartir
Exportar a
Exportar a MendeleyRefworksEndNoteBibTexRIS
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor/es
Gutiérrez Madroñal, LorenaAutoridad UCA; García Domínguez, Antonio; Medina Bulo, Inmaculada
Fecha
2020-07
Departamento/s
Ingeniería Informática
Fuente
2020 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), Glasgow, UK, 2020, pp. 1-8
Resumen
Mutation testing is a well-known fault-based technique that has been applied to different domains as new technologies have appeared. Evolutionary Mutation Testing (EMT) finds mutants that are useful to produce new test cases. It uses evolutionary algorithms to reduce the number of mutants that are generated, keeping as many difficult to kill and stubborn mutants (strong mutants) as possible in the reduced set. Given the popularity of real-time systems, the MuEPL mutation system was developed for the Esper Event Processing Language (EPL), a query language aimed at the Internet of Things (IoT). In past work, EMT was integrated into MuEPL, and it reduced the cost of finding strong mutants in some EPL queries but not in others. This study takes a step forward by proposing and evaluating two metaheuristics for EMT that combine EMT and random selection: one which bootstraps the hall of fame with a random subset (Bootstrapped EMT), and one which falls back to random selection after a certain point (Inverse EMT). While BEMT is shown to outperform IEMT in most cases, BEMT has not managed to outperform EMT. An additional experiment studies the impact of low-quality mutation operators in the relative performance of BEMT, IEMT and plain EMT. Results suggest that the MuEPL RRO operator was the reason for the poor performance of EMT in some scenarios.
Materias
Internet of Things; Testing; Evolutionary algorithms
Colecciones
  • Contribuciones a Seminario o Congreso [677]
  • Contribuciones a Seminario o Congreso Ing. Infor. [96]
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional

Listar

Todo RODINComunidades y ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMaterias

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Información adicional

Acerca de...Deposita en RODINPolíticasNormativasDerechos de autorEnlaces de interésEstadísticasNovedadesPreguntas frecuentes

RODIN está accesible a través de

OpenAIREOAIsterRecolectaHispanaEuropeanaBaseDARTOATDGoogle Académico

Enlaces de interés

Sherpa/RomeoDulcineaROAROpenDOARCreative CommonsORCID

RODIN está gestionado por el Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz

ContactoSugerenciasAtención al Usuario