• español
    • English
  • Login
  • English 
    • español
    • English

UniversidaddeCádiz

Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones
Communities and Collections
View Item 
  •   RODIN Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • View Item
  •   RODIN Home
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Comparative Analysis of AWJM Performance in FFF-Printed PLA and PLA–CF: Influence of Process Parameters and Cutting Regions

Thumbnail
Identificadores

URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/39972

DOI: 10.3390/polym18101210

ISSN: 2073-4360

Files
polymers-18-01210-v2.pdf (6.288Mb)
Statistics
View statistics
Metrics and citations
 
Share
Export
Export reference to MendeleyRefworksEndNoteBibTexRIS
Metadata
Show full item record
Author/s
De la Rosa Silva, Sergio; Batista, Moisés; Mayuet Ares, Pedro FranciscoAuthority UCA; Rodríguez Parada, María LucíaAuthority UCA
Date
2026
Department
Ingeniería Mecánica y Diseño Industrial
Source
Polymers 2026, vol. 18, n. 10, 1210
Abstract
Additive manufacturing by Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) enables the fabrication of complex polymer components, although limitations in surface quality and dimensional accuracy often require post-processing. Abrasive water jet machining (AWJM) is a non-thermal technique suitable for improving surface integrity in polymers and composites without inducing thermal damage. This study investigates the AWJM performance on FFF-printed polylactic acid (PLA) and carbon-fiber-reinforced PLA (PLA–CF), focusing on the influence of water pressure (WP), traverse feed rate (TFR), and abrasive mass flow rate (AMFR). A full factorial design was implemented, and surface integrity was evaluated through surface roughness (Ra) and kerf taper (T), considering their variation across characteristic cutting regions: initial damage region (IDR), smooth cutting region (SCR), and rough cutting region (RCR). Results show that WP and TFR are the dominant parameters, while AMFR has a limited effect within the studied range. The SCR exhibits the lowest roughness, whereas the RCR shows significant degradation due to energy loss. Both materials present similar behavior, with only minor improvements in PLA–CF. ANOVA confirms that process parameters have a stronger influence than material type, providing useful criteria for AWJM optimization in FFF polymers.
Subjects
abrasive water jet machining; fused filament fabrication; polylactic acid; surface integrity; process parameters
Collections
  • Artículos Científicos [11777]
  • Articulos Científicos Ing. Mec. [320]
Attribution 4.0 Internacional
This work is under a Creative Commons License Attribution 4.0 Internacional

Browse

All of RODINCommunities and CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Información adicional

AboutDeposit in RODINPoliciesGuidelinesRightsLinksStatisticsNewsFrequently Asked Questions

RODIN is available through

OpenAIREOAIsterRecolectaHispanaEuropeanaBaseDARTOATDGoogle Academic

Related links

Sherpa/RomeoDulcineaROAROpenDOARCreative CommonsORCID

RODIN está gestionado por el Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz

Contact informationSuggestionsUser Support