• español
    • English
  • Login
  • español 
    • español
    • English

UniversidaddeCádiz

Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones
Comunidades y colecciones
Ver ítem 
  •   RODIN Principal
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • Ver ítem
  •   RODIN Principal
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Utilizing supplementary high-strength suture tying over a bone bridge enhances the effectiveness of interference screw as tibial fixation method in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Thumbnail
Identificadores

URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/40025

DOI: 10.1186/s43019-026-00325-5

URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43019-026-00325-5

ISSN: 2234-2451

Ficheros
Artículo principal (1.688Mb)
Estadísticas
Ver estadísticas
Métricas y Citas
 
Compartir
Exportar a
Exportar a MendeleyRefworksEndNoteBibTexRIS
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor/es
Arriaza, Álvaro; Miragaya, Pablo; Mora Macías, Juan; Reina Romo, Esther; Blázquez Carmona, PabloAutoridad UCA; Marco, Fernando; Arriaza, Rafael
Fecha
2026-07-14
Departamento/s
Ingeniería Mecánica y Diseño Industrial
Fuente
Knee Surgery & Related Research - 2026, Vol. 38 n.30
Resumen
Background: Tibial fixation is the biomechanical weak point in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, with numerous techniques proposed to address this challenge. This study evaluates the utility of a simple, costeffective system: high-strength suture tying over a bone bridge (BB). Its effectiveness as standalone fixation and as a supplement to standard interference screw (IS) fixation is compared with IS alone and supplemented with other commercial systems. Methods: A biomechanical study was conducted using six fixation methods tested on 61 specimens with bovine extensor tendons in porcine tibial models. Groups included BB alone, IS alone, and four hybrid fixation methods: IS+BB, IS+a cortical screw post (CSP), IS+a PushLock® anchor, and IS+a SwiveLock® anchor, with at least nine specimens per group. Specimens underwent cyclic load testing (500 cycles at 100–200 N) and pull-to-failure tests (20 mm/min) to measure displacement, ultimate load to failure, and stiffness. Results: Standalone BB fixation showed limited performance, with an ultimate load to failure of 357.81±90.53 N and cyclic displacement of 14.88±3.28 mm, insufficient for early rehabilitation. When combined with IS, BB significantly improved performance, achieving an ultimate load to failure of 500.55±151.24 N, comparable to commercial systems, and reducing cyclic displacement to 4.82±0.83 mm. Hybrid fixation methods lowered early failure rates to 10%, compared with 30–40% in single-method fixations, confirming enhanced stability. Conclusions: Hybrid fixation methods are more reliable than simple ones for tibial fixation. Combining IS with BB provides a biomechanically robust and cost-effective solution for ACL reconstruction. This simple, ecological and affordable method reduces early failure rates, minimizes cyclic displacement, and achieves outcomes comparable to commercial systems, offering a practical choice for improving ACL repair outcomes.
Materias
ACL; Tibial fixation; Supplementary fixation; Bone bridge; Biomechanical study
Colecciones
  • Artículos Científicos [11968]
  • Articulos Científicos Ing. Mec. [325]
Attribution 4.0 Internacional
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internacional

Listar

Todo RODINComunidades y ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMaterias

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Información adicional

Acerca de...Deposita en RODINPolíticasNormativasDerechos de autorEnlaces de interésEstadísticasNovedadesPreguntas frecuentes

RODIN está accesible a través de

OpenAIREOAIsterRecolectaHispanaEuropeanaBaseDARTOATDGoogle Académico

Enlaces de interés

Sherpa/RomeoDulcineaROAROpenDOARCreative CommonsORCID

RODIN está gestionado por el Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz

ContactoSugerenciasAtención al Usuario