Cognitive performance and psychological wellbeing in hybrid human-robot crews in space analog missions: The delayed unwinding paradox
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/40337
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2026.08.063
ISSN: 0094-5765
Statistics
Metrics and citations
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor/s
González de la Torre Benítez, Gabriel
; Ramallo Luna, Miguel Ángel
; López Ramírez, Juan Antonio
; González de la Torre Muñoz, Sara
; Parro, Victorino; Lominchar, Miguel A.; García Villadangos, Miriam; Carrasco Gómez, Martín; Zarandona Palacio, Pedro José
; Claeys, Kato; Avila Rauch, Celia; Mintus, Agata; Ceballos, David; Violadé, Carlos; Ramirez, Cristina; Ráčková, Lucie
Date
2027-01Department
Psicología; Tecnologías del Medio AmbienteSource
Acta Astronautica - 2027, vol. 250, pp. 394–403.Abstract
Background
The integration of UAVs and AI assistants into human exploration teams introduces both operational benefits and novel psychophysiological demands. As planetary exploration missions increasingly rely on human-robot collaboration, understanding the cognitive and psychological consequences of hybrid operational work becomes a critical priority for crew health and mission success. This study examines cognitive performance and psychological wellbeing in a Hybrid Team (n = 6) during a multi-day cave analog mission, comparing results against a pooled Non-Hybrid Teams dataset (N = 45; 8 missions).
Methods
NASA TLX (Task Load Index), WinSCAT cognitive assessment (pre, mid, post-mission), DASS-21, and POMS were administered at Astroland Ares Station (Cantabria, Spain). Mission operations incorporated UAV systems and simulated 7-min one-way Mars communication delays with Mission Control. Between-group comparisons used Mann-Whitney U tests; within-group longitudinal changes used Wilcoxon signed-rank and Friedman tests.
Results
The Hybrid Team showed significantly higher pre-mission sustained attention (CPT: 95.9 ± 1.4% vs 81.7 ± 18.4%; U = 200, p = .010, r = 0.67) and stable cognitive performance across all WinSCAT subtests. Non-Hybrid Teams showed significant CPT improvement over time (χ2 = 12.47, p = .002). Post-mission tension was significantly elevated in the Hybrid Team vs Non-Hybrid Teams (39.7 vs 32.4; p = .005) despite Non-Hybrid Teams showing significant tension reduction (p < .001). Fatigue increased in the Hybrid Team post-mission (W = 1, p = .094) while decreasing in Non-Hybrid Teams (p = .013).
Conclusions
Hybrid Team integration preserves cognitive performance but produced a post-mission unwinding failure pattern characterized by sustained activation that prevented emotional deactivation. Implications for recovery protocols and hybrid mission design are discussed.





