Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGonzález de la Torre Benítez, Gabriel 
dc.contributor.authorRamallo Luna, Miguel Ángel 
dc.contributor.authorLópez Ramírez, Juan Antonio 
dc.contributor.authorGonzález de la Torre Muñoz, Sara 
dc.contributor.authorParro, Victorino
dc.contributor.authorLominchar, Miguel A.
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Villadangos, Miriam
dc.contributor.authorCarrasco Gómez, Martín
dc.contributor.authorZarandona Palacio, Pedro José 
dc.contributor.authorClaeys, Kato
dc.contributor.authorAvila Rauch, Celia
dc.contributor.authorMintus, Agata
dc.contributor.authorCeballos, David
dc.contributor.authorVioladé, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorRamirez, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorRáčková, Lucie
dc.contributor.otherPsicologíaes_ES
dc.contributor.otherTecnologías del Medio Ambientees_ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-08T10:18:25Z
dc.date.available2026-10-08T10:18:25Z
dc.date.issued2027-01
dc.identifier.issn0094-5765
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10498/40337
dc.description.abstractBackground The integration of UAVs and AI assistants into human exploration teams introduces both operational benefits and novel psychophysiological demands. As planetary exploration missions increasingly rely on human-robot collaboration, understanding the cognitive and psychological consequences of hybrid operational work becomes a critical priority for crew health and mission success. This study examines cognitive performance and psychological wellbeing in a Hybrid Team (n = 6) during a multi-day cave analog mission, comparing results against a pooled Non-Hybrid Teams dataset (N = 45; 8 missions). Methods NASA TLX (Task Load Index), WinSCAT cognitive assessment (pre, mid, post-mission), DASS-21, and POMS were administered at Astroland Ares Station (Cantabria, Spain). Mission operations incorporated UAV systems and simulated 7-min one-way Mars communication delays with Mission Control. Between-group comparisons used Mann-Whitney U tests; within-group longitudinal changes used Wilcoxon signed-rank and Friedman tests. Results The Hybrid Team showed significantly higher pre-mission sustained attention (CPT: 95.9 ± 1.4% vs 81.7 ± 18.4%; U = 200, p = .010, r = 0.67) and stable cognitive performance across all WinSCAT subtests. Non-Hybrid Teams showed significant CPT improvement over time (χ2 = 12.47, p = .002). Post-mission tension was significantly elevated in the Hybrid Team vs Non-Hybrid Teams (39.7 vs 32.4; p = .005) despite Non-Hybrid Teams showing significant tension reduction (p < .001). Fatigue increased in the Hybrid Team post-mission (W = 1, p = .094) while decreasing in Non-Hybrid Teams (p = .013). Conclusions Hybrid Team integration preserves cognitive performance but produced a post-mission unwinding failure pattern characterized by sustained activation that prevented emotional deactivation. Implications for recovery protocols and hybrid mission design are discussed.es_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceActa Astronautica - 2027, vol. 250, pp. 394–403.es_ES
dc.subjectNASA-TLXes_ES
dc.subjectWinSCATes_ES
dc.subjectHybrid teamses_ES
dc.subjectUAVes_ES
dc.subjectSpace analogses_ES
dc.subjectCognitive performancees_ES
dc.subjectPOMSes_ES
dc.subjectUnwindinges_ES
dc.subjectWorkloades_ES
dc.titleCognitive performance and psychological wellbeing in hybrid human-robot crews in space analog missions: The delayed unwinding paradoxes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsembargoed accesses_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2026.08.063
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICIN//PID2022-141475NB-I00es_ES
dc.type.hasVersionAMes_ES


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
This work is under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional