• español
    • English
  • Login
  • español 
    • español
    • English

UniversidaddeCádiz

Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones
Comunidades y colecciones
Ver ítem 
  •   RODIN Principal
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • Ver ítem
  •   RODIN Principal
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Feeling safe or unsafe in prehospital emergency care: A qualitative study of the experiences of patients, carers and healthcare professionals

Identificadores

URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/34305

DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15513.

ISSN: 0962-1067

ISSN: 1365-2702

Ficheros
Acceso cerrado (933.2Kb)
Estadísticas
Ver estadísticas
Métricas y Citas
 
Compartir
Exportar a
Exportar a MendeleyRefworksEndNoteBibTexRIS
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor/es
Péculo-Carrasco, Juan Antonio; Sola Perea, Helena deAutoridad UCA; Casal-Sánchez, María del Mar; Rodríguez Bouza, Mónica; Sánchez-Almagro, César Pedro; Failde Martínez, InmaculadaAutoridad UCA
Fecha
2020-12-01
Departamento/s
Biomedicina, Biotecnología y Salud Pública; Economía General; Enfermería y Fisioterapia
Fuente
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Dec;29(23-24):4720-4732.
Resumen
Aims and objectives: To determine the feelings of safety among patients taken to hospital after requesting urgent care, based on their experiences and those of their carers and prehospital emergency care professionals. Background: Little research has been performed into the perception of safety in prehospital emergency care settings worldwide, from either the perspective of the patients or from that of healthcare professionals. Design: Exploratory qualitative study using focus groups in Spain. Methods: The participants were patients that requested care through the emergency telephone service, their carers and the professionals of the emergency care teams. The structured sampling design was based on an intentional, nonprobability selection following pragmatic criteria. Seven groups of patients/carers and two groups of professionals were formed (65 participants). The recordings were fully transcribed before their validation and codes were assigned to ensure anonymity. The ATLAS.ti software was used for the analysis. The authors took into account the COREQ checklist for qualitative studies. Findings: Neither group provided a clear definition of the meaning of feeling safe. It appeared easier to give examples that had a positive or negative influence on their perception of feeling safe. During the analysis of the discourse, six categories were detected after grouping the related codes. Conclusions: For most of the patients' feeling of being safe or very safe arose from the perception of calmness, trust and protection. Defining the perception of safety was not easy. The factors with the greatest effect on feeling safe were related to Information and communication, Person-centred care and Professional competency, without losing sight of other factors such as Accessibility and response times of the emergency teams, Equipment and Healthcare setting. Relevance to clinical practice: The findings could be used as a knowledge base in future research and for implementing procedures for improving perceptions of safety among patients.
Materias
feeling safe; feeling unsafe; focus groups; healthcare professionals’; perceptions; patient safety; patient's perceptions; prehospital emergency care; qualitative research
Colecciones
  • Artículos Científicos [11968]
  • Articulos Científicos Biomedicina [582]
  • Articulos Científicos Ec. Gen. [276]
  • Articulos Científicos Enf. Fisio. [325]
  • Artículos Científicos INIBICA [1093]
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional

Listar

Todo RODINComunidades y ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMaterias

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Información adicional

Acerca de...Deposita en RODINPolíticasNormativasDerechos de autorEnlaces de interésEstadísticasNovedadesPreguntas frecuentes

RODIN está accesible a través de

OpenAIREOAIsterRecolectaHispanaEuropeanaBaseDARTOATDGoogle Académico

Enlaces de interés

Sherpa/RomeoDulcineaROAROpenDOARCreative CommonsORCID

RODIN está gestionado por el Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz

ContactoSugerenciasAtención al Usuario