• español
    • English
  • Login
  • español 
    • español
    • English

UniversidaddeCádiz

Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones
Comunidades y colecciones
Ver ítem 
  •   RODIN Principal
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • Ver ítem
  •   RODIN Principal
  • Producción Científica
  • Artículos Científicos
  • Ver ítem
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The Integration of AI into the Nursing Process: A Comparative Analysis of NANDA, NOC, and NIC-Based Care Plans

Thumbnail
Identificadores

URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10498/37973

DOI: 10.3390/nursrep15060186

ISSN: 2039-4403

ISSN: 2039-439X

Ficheros
OA_2025_0697.pdf (261.2Kb)
Estadísticas
Ver estadísticas
Métricas y Citas
 
Compartir
Exportar a
Exportar a MendeleyRefworksEndNoteBibTexRIS
Metadatos
Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
Autor/es
Gilart Cantizano, EsterAutoridad UCA; Anna, Bocchino; Gilart-Cantizano, Patricia; Cotobal-Calvo, Eva Manuela; Lepiani Díaz, Isabel; Román Sánchez, Daniel; Palazón-Fernández, José Luis
Fecha
2025-05-27
Departamento/s
Enfermería y Fisioterapia
Fuente
Nursing Reports, Vol. 15, Núm. 6, 2025
Resumen
Background/Objectives: Nursing diagnosis is a complex process that requires clinical judgment, time, and resources and whose implementation is hindered by factors such as workload, lack of time, and resistance to computerized systems. This study aimed to compare the quality and efficiency of care plans generated by nursing professionals versus those produced by an artificial intelligence (AI) model, using the NANDA, NOC, and NIC taxonomies as criteria. Methods: An observational study was carried out with three simulated clinical cases. Thirty experts, fifty-four nursing professionals, and the ChatGPT model (GPT-4) were included. The experts established the referral plans using the Delphi technique. Responses were evaluated with a validated rubric (EADE-2) and analyzed using nonparametric tests. Professionals’ perceptions on the use of computer systems were also collected. Results: ChatGPT scored significantly higher on several dimensions (p < 0.001) and resolved all three cases in 35 s, compared to an average of 30 min for practitioners. Professionals expressed dissatisfaction with current diagnostic documentation systems. Conclusions: AI demonstrates high potential in optimizing the diagnostic process in nursing, although for its implementation human supervision, ethical aspects and improvements in current systems must be considered to achieve effective integration.
Materias
expert panel; nursing professionals; artificial intelligence; diagnostic process
Colecciones
  • Artículos Científicos [12009]
  • Articulos Científicos Enf. Fisio. [325]
Attribution 4.0 Internacional
Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internacional

Listar

Todo RODINComunidades y ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMaterias

Mi cuenta

AccederRegistro

Estadísticas

Ver Estadísticas de uso

Información adicional

Acerca de...Deposita en RODINPolíticasNormativasDerechos de autorEnlaces de interésEstadísticasNovedadesPreguntas frecuentes

RODIN está accesible a través de

OpenAIREOAIsterRecolectaHispanaEuropeanaBaseDARTOATDGoogle Académico

Enlaces de interés

Sherpa/RomeoDulcineaROAROpenDOARCreative CommonsORCID

RODIN está gestionado por el Área de Biblioteca, Archivo y Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz

ContactoSugerenciasAtención al Usuario